1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <gmaxwell@gmail.com>) id 1VXfpT-0007s6-J1
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sat, 19 Oct 2013 23:21:07 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.217.181 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.217.181; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com;
helo=mail-lb0-f181.google.com;
Received: from mail-lb0-f181.google.com ([209.85.217.181])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1VXfpS-00043m-Kh
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sat, 19 Oct 2013 23:21:07 +0000
Received: by mail-lb0-f181.google.com with SMTP id x18so2587560lbi.40
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Sat, 19 Oct 2013 16:20:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.29.17 with SMTP id f17mr106874lbh.45.1382224859907; Sat,
19 Oct 2013 16:20:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.89.72 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 16:20:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201310192229.19932.luke@dashjr.org>
References: <CAKLmikPZhhTs2rf5h52KHLrWB38S=JgiOc+pCPx0FXvT7c_aow@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgTcTKAA0Xdzk3xZ-3sWwoPgPGmQdugG-0jjhPmntXitfQ@mail.gmail.com>
<38895569-E6E1-4576-9E36-B00B53F9D3CC@me.com>
<201310192229.19932.luke@dashjr.org>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 16:20:59 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgRu1j0w8RsiYutixEDxs1NYZVxQ7D7VRgDVi1b-wx+vUQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
To: Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(gmaxwell[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
for more information. [URIs: dashjr.org]
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1VXfpS-00043m-Kh
Cc: Bitcoin Development <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] A critique of bitcoin open source
community
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 23:21:07 -0000
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote:
> See BIP 1 for the process.. proposals go to this mailing list first.
FWIW, he did post to the mailing list and he got an underwhelming response:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=3D20ec1e35-3051-45=
d6-b449-e4a4d5c06dc8%40me.com&forum_name=3Dbitcoin-development
When I responded to him on BCT I said "I was about to suggest you hit
the mailing list for some initial comments first=E2=80=94 but I see you've
done that. I'll issue a number in a couple days once there has been a
little chance for some discussion.".
Since much discussion didn't materialize I went and gave it a
technical once over, posting to the forum. In hindsight, I probably
should have also posted my review to the mailing list, which might
have served to restart some additional discussion.
|
