Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.217.181 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.217.181; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-lb0-f181.google.com; 
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <201310192229.19932.luke@dashjr.org>
References: <CAKLmikPZhhTs2rf5h52KHLrWB38S=JgiOc+pCPx0FXvT7c_aow@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAS2fgTcTKAA0Xdzk3xZ-3sWwoPgPGmQdugG-0jjhPmntXitfQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<38895569-E6E1-4576-9E36-B00B53F9D3CC@me.com>
	<201310192229.19932.luke@dashjr.org>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 16:20:59 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgRu1j0w8RsiYutixEDxs1NYZVxQ7D7VRgDVi1b-wx+vUQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
To: Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Bitcoin Development <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] A critique of bitcoin open source
	community
Precedence: list

On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote:
> See BIP 1 for the process.. proposals go to this mailing list first.

FWIW, he did post to the mailing list and he got an underwhelming response:

http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=3D20ec1e35-3051-45=
d6-b449-e4a4d5c06dc8%40me.com&forum_name=3Dbitcoin-development

When I responded to him on BCT I said "I was about to suggest you hit
the mailing list for some initial comments first=E2=80=94 but I see you've
done that. I'll issue a number in a couple days once there has been a
little chance for some discussion.".

Since much discussion didn't materialize I went and gave it a
technical once over, posting to the forum.  In hindsight, I probably
should have also posted my review to the mailing list, which might
have served to restart some additional discussion.