1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <rdwnj@yahoo.com>) id 1VRZOd-0006mJ-Pq
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 03 Oct 2013 03:16:11 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from nm28-vm4.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com ([98.136.216.163])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.76) id 1VRZOc-0003cs-AU
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 03 Oct 2013 03:16:11 +0000
Received: from [98.137.12.191] by nm28.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
03 Oct 2013 03:16:04 -0000
Received: from [98.137.12.216] by tm12.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
03 Oct 2013 03:16:04 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1024.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
03 Oct 2013 03:16:04 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 197909.88657.bm@omp1024.mail.gq1.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 7797 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Oct 2013 03:16:03 -0000
X-YMail-OSG: 1FUFgFwVM1mIsfIutbS07cEkcMiWb1sPZmt96T4OShWmxXw
oAmOMuiLXy90IfdYnpxbrAI_ZSl5bVc.l0Oo5WYBhEWu25zP0zSfRZdu9s5t
ZgElfD2R5y1W6A6QG1FI9W.trUaR4JiPUBmPQ7bEMvZasFscvaVRarZzPPkY
FsxO4PoMDT_vMLG.qJIr0gcze14v_cHgEJhnp0jL4aF8xhPIhbpWw6s4mD6w
j5_kClmojtWoDSbvojn_gWpCStizwspSNL0AMD4W07mMOYQwiraELr90wlbT
X253_PS9vnISz_Ki61HTG_6RIbntIelrR4dTtAVy5i7HIB1j.Dj9cM_gQlzM
0UgF18ADBO_pTQWOTh8v9Yg5ZeJ4R2W5ijSlKDSbNhOG0rKl5fTqx0A8tJ9m
HyxxVTrUbrHhtFXFBt0nc9sPD603JCBTiNRZgx5qCvIPI2eZN6NitQMwiZE7
XGMN4471NNWXe_crO_Slura2p5UXbFTvU5VmhbvrsUakg8jtJwvINCO4O959
vOIU.CG5tnkbvfytlkKQE6_hKCyheTkcna0xB2AOj8quL9pOODPRjSizLdpU
hYHuRuFGK7HKJT6ivtwYnaNaaiAxPKwdBtHjuQEcL0xeU46TuVwqtu_sKfZo
_YWRusIiFb3kdVMT6GWNA
Received: from [68.196.240.212] by web124502.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP;
Wed, 02 Oct 2013 20:16:03 PDT
X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001,
SSBvbmx5IGJyaW5nIHRoaXMgdXAgaGVyZSBzaW5jZSBJIGNhbid0IHJhaXNlIGh0dHBzOi8vYml0Y29pbnRhbGsub3JnPyBQZXJoYXBzIGl0IHJ1bnMgb24gdGhlIHNpbGsgcm9hZCBzZXJ2ZXJzOikKClVwb24gbG9va2luZyBhdCB0aGUgMC44LjUgJiBlYXJsaWVyIGNvZGUgZm9yIENEQjpSZXdyaXRlKCksIGluIHRoZSBmaWxlcyBkYi5oIGFuZCBkYi5jcHAsIHlvdSB3aWxsIG5vdGljZSB0aGF0IGluIGRiLmggaXQgaXMgZGVjbGFyZWQgYm9vbCBzdGF0aWMsIGJ1dCBpbiBkYi5jcHAgaXQgaXNuJ3QuIElzIHQBMAEBAQE-
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.160.587
Message-ID: <1380770163.7534.YahooMailNeo@web124502.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 20:16:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ron <rdwnj@yahoo.com>
To: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
<bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="-626213187-280908893-1380770163=:7534"
X-Spam-Score: 2.1 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust [98.136.216.163 listed in list.dnswl.org]
0.6 HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM Envelope sender username looks random
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(rdwnj[at]yahoo.com)
1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
[Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?98.136.216.163>]
-0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
domain
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
for more information. [URIs: bitcointalk.org]
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1VRZOc-0003cs-AU
Subject: [Bitcoin-development] on CDB::Rewrite()
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Ron <rdwnj@yahoo.com>
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 03:16:12 -0000
---626213187-280908893-1380770163=:7534
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I only bring this up here since I can't raise https://bitcointalk.org? Perh=
aps it runs on the silk road servers:)=0A=0AUpon looking at the 0.8.5 & ear=
lier code for CDB:Rewrite(), in the files db.h and db.cpp, you will notice =
that in db.h it is declared bool static, but in db.cpp it isn't. Is this a =
problem? Or a feature? Or nothing at all?=0A=0A=0AFurthermore, it is called=
only in wallet.cpp -->CWallet::EncryptWallet() but its return value is ign=
ored? Again, intentional or a bug or a feature or a ...?=0ANow CWallet::Enc=
ryptWallet() is called by AskPassphraseDialog::accept() and WalletModel::se=
tWalletEncrypted()and they seem very interested in what=A0 CWallet::Encrypt=
Wallet() returns. Could this be involved in some old issue with wallet encr=
yption on bitcoin-qt 0.8.1?=0A=0AThere seems to be plenty of this kind of "=
suspicious" code to ferret about in, with one's IDE during quiet moments. A=
musing is to follow return 0 and return 1 to try and infer their meaning, t=
heir intent?=0A=0A=0ARon=0A
---626213187-280908893-1380770163=:7534
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html><body><div style=3D"color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:ti=
mes new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><div>I only bring thi=
s up here since I can't raise https://bitcointalk.org? Perhaps it runs on t=
he silk road servers:)</div><div><br></div><div style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0=
); font-size: 16px; font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; back=
ground-color: transparent; font-style: normal;">Upon looking at the 0.8.5 &=
amp; earlier code for CDB:Rewrite(), in the files db.h and db.cpp, you will=
notice that in db.h it is declared bool static, but in db.cpp it isn't. Is=
this a problem? Or a feature? Or nothing at all?<br></div><div><br></div><=
div style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 16px; font-family: times new r=
oman,new york,times,serif; background-color: transparent; font-style: norma=
l;">Furthermore, it is called only in wallet.cpp -->CWallet::EncryptWall=
et() but its return value is ignored? Again, intentional or a bug or a
feature or a ...?</div><div style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 16px;=
font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; background-color: trans=
parent; font-style: normal;">Now CWallet::EncryptWallet() is called by AskP=
assphraseDialog::accept() and WalletModel::setWalletEncrypted()and they see=
m very interested in what CWallet::EncryptWallet() returns. Could thi=
s be involved in some old issue with wallet encryption on bitcoin-qt 0.8.1?=
</div><div style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 16px; font-family: time=
s new roman,new york,times,serif; background-color: transparent; font-style=
: normal;"><br></div><div style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 16px; fo=
nt-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; background-color: transpar=
ent; font-style: normal;">There seems to be plenty of this kind of "suspici=
ous" code to ferret about in, with one's IDE during quiet moments. Amusing =
is to follow return 0 and return 1 to try and infer their meaning, their
intent?<br></div><div style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 16px; font-=
family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; background-color: transparent=
; font-style: normal;"><br></div><div style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-si=
ze: 16px; font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; background-col=
or: transparent; font-style: normal;">Ron<br></div></div></body></html>
---626213187-280908893-1380770163=:7534--
|
