summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/bf/6bb15b243bfd4ff9074723a8f51ed4ac696d03
blob: 0072b7a70757299006ec5258492e0ea77b78bc0b (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <luke@dashjr.org>) id 1RqxM4-0004A1-35
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sat, 28 Jan 2012 01:45:24 +0000
X-ACL-Warn: 
Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([173.242.112.54])
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	id 1RqxM2-0002UX-Re for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sat, 28 Jan 2012 01:45:24 +0000
Received: from ishibashi.localnet (fl-184-4-164-217.dhcp.embarqhsd.net
	[184.4.164.217]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr)
	by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 21C8D5606F8;
	Sat, 28 Jan 2012 01:45:17 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Luke-Jr" <luke@dashjr.org>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:45:09 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.1.5-gentoo; KDE/4.7.4; x86_64; ; )
References: <1327704664.31621.YahooMailNeo@web121003.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
	<201201271800.31819.luke@dashjr.org>
	<05d62c81-ef50-4c43-8fa5-65592c8f54a4@email.android.com>
In-Reply-To: <05d62c81-ef50-4c43-8fa5-65592c8f54a4@email.android.com>
X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: CE5A D56A 36CC 69FA E7D2 3558 665F C11D D53E 9583
X-PGP-Key-ID: 665FC11DD53E9583
X-PGP-Keyserver: x-hkp://subkeys.pgp.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201201272045.10787.luke@dashjr.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
	domain
X-Headers-End: 1RqxM2-0002UX-Re
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP 0020: URI Scheme
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 01:45:24 -0000

On Friday, January 27, 2012 7:36:31 PM bitcoin-list@bluematt.me wrote:
> It was implemented in the waylaying client with the merge of Bitcoin-Qt for
> drag and drop, and just recently for system URI handling in
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/70f55355e29c8e45b607e782c5d76609
> d23cc858.

It's been implemented in many clients for nearly all 2011.
Bitcoin-Qt is just behind the pace. Not relevant.

> However the version on the wiki armed as BIP 20 has a ton of extraneous crap
> in it's number encoding which is not implemented in Bitcoin-Qt since it was
> explicitly voted against at the time the spec was being discussed.

You mean 3 months *after* the spec had a consensus and multiple 
implementations.