From: "Luke-Jr" <luke@dashjr.org>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:45:09 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.1.5-gentoo; KDE/4.7.4; x86_64; ; )
References: <1327704664.31621.YahooMailNeo@web121003.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
	<201201271800.31819.luke@dashjr.org>
	<05d62c81-ef50-4c43-8fa5-65592c8f54a4@email.android.com>
In-Reply-To: <05d62c81-ef50-4c43-8fa5-65592c8f54a4@email.android.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201201272045.10787.luke@dashjr.org>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP 0020: URI Scheme
Precedence: list

On Friday, January 27, 2012 7:36:31 PM bitcoin-list@bluematt.me wrote:
> It was implemented in the waylaying client with the merge of Bitcoin-Qt for
> drag and drop, and just recently for system URI handling in
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/70f55355e29c8e45b607e782c5d76609
> d23cc858.

It's been implemented in many clients for nearly all 2011.
Bitcoin-Qt is just behind the pace. Not relevant.

> However the version on the wiki armed as BIP 20 has a ton of extraneous crap
> in it's number encoding which is not implemented in Bitcoin-Qt since it was
> explicitly voted against at the time the spec was being discussed.

You mean 3 months *after* the spec had a consensus and multiple 
implementations.