1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
|
Return-Path: <yifu@coinapex.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DA4C88B
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 10:55:52 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ob0-f199.google.com (mail-ob0-f199.google.com
[209.85.214.199])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06E6663
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 10:55:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by obcji4 with SMTP id ji4so81649294obc.3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 03:55:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=coinapex.com; s=google;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:content-type; bh=VPGQUElQ2x2zV0uoaqOXbNRBGu7mK/J7yyM49eCs4Kc=;
b=abW8T8fDWhlHBbSWlCPHjPt3vU/cb0lSV6B6uGHzQ+/FWaYmOCbDstLyF5UGz9QQT5
aK+2Qc4ZE3fCt1URjiV1laIrweXf9r7mcTdQ1tfcZkt14vakmYumNl2OeyTaEBjIyaD2
8haIXVcDd2QW42hAob5wlGJPziHelBNw/9ZEU=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
bh=VPGQUElQ2x2zV0uoaqOXbNRBGu7mK/J7yyM49eCs4Kc=;
b=CPDPD6lpYze21t5poqE+8d9ouCaKS5/ZvaukIaf/YK8L2KuJgHHXSmUuOFwe+cstB9
i85LZATxfEg9Fo0wxfgT4ELOgScCpEpxhXykzn2GyJJmYrzTYSgl7xTSL5TsenQkYZS5
tSEe04SrWYXX0E63DaxndRSSk2pXigjI0NGIX4ttTv0tgbyiayGXKlwjgYeqcFfZ9Gy1
QZCclCiydf8CRFIa1/b3Kl2IWZWSwE8ts5Xj4aD90rgvV66LP5NbXbotpdSsp0r5l8M1
IBhH29G9t9gwtwOyi0dr2Um461IdjE1QlZSO17YmBgdSEUWMcZk0xWXK2AEA6b6gqr5h
2gpA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn5dFi7nAwUP9nSwFkBUJQpeOGtMq83sBj4Y2H6ioBZQ1xcEvyAC5QWp9+rFG7zbVXN6NcP
X-Received: by 10.202.225.136 with SMTP id y130mr6893643oig.16.1440154550322;
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 03:55:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.202.84.69 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 03:55:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <3B2A58B3-6AF6-4F1C-A6FA-7AEC97F48AD0@petertodd.org>
References: <CA+1nnrk1EWd7rhwj91p1rqgGVFgOT4UYq=+Nmq41sHJYmy7YYA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgR4bsJtC99-fK1L+FsQT7vOfOpz9FOVqvAnqbpkaRJHLQ@mail.gmail.com>
<BE291934-F40A-4163-834C-6B3FFBD7C4E0@petertodd.org>
<CADJgMzucVKgQQtzwBNMcU3Vy=ae+2jMQY=am_xYXcKtyforpUg@mail.gmail.com>
<3B2A58B3-6AF6-4F1C-A6FA-7AEC97F48AD0@petertodd.org>
From: Yifu Guo <yifu@coinapex.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 06:55:10 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHcfU-XrSA6p_2AJJ1W6KmatkEZdvh1W4ruA-upq4wPWoaJTNQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113d632464f708051dd01c3f
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham
version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Core Devs : can you share your thoughts about all
BIPs on this website ?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 10:55:52 -0000
--001a113d632464f708051dd01c3f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
I like the intend of this attempt to bring more clarity to the blocksize
debate, however it would be more help to make this a information site about
the current outstanding BIPs and summarize their differences rather than
voting mechanism.
(ofcourse the author of the BIPs would "vote" for their own proposals.)
It would be good to include supporting and counter statements regards to
these BIPs on the site.
in addition to highlight certain things like pools in china have voiced
their opinion that increase should happen, and 8mb is something they are
comfortable with, which is not directly related to a single BIP, but never
the less relevant in this discussion.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 5:35 AM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
>
>
> On 21 August 2015 02:31:51 GMT-07:00, Btc Drak <btcdrak@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
> ><bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >> What might be valuable is to ask devs to explain what their threat
> >models are, what should be at the root of their thinking about the
> >blocksize.
> >
> >That's exactly what the "Technical Opinion" column is for.
>
> What if could be used for; theres value in being more explicit.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iQE9BAEBCgAnIBxQZXRlciBUb2RkIDxwZXRlQHBldGVydG9kZC5vcmc+BQJV1vDG
> AAoJEMCF8hzn9Lncz4MIAIMtLLA4q7KJiwrYrpjFWme1ys9iyPZiADJGQWG3qKlH
> Q4pEcwWt69jfTUCjLYfegsDW4eEMarejs568iSF70hvGB4OPWrYK3YiM1cWlWtDD
> seN3G/4dJjehL7h1Nz+/OTjTlePkguHctRlJTavel8sI7fg356iMJc1Ggm5Q1ZFl
> CLrivr/CEO7Qk9Uo5ewhnwConKjLygSyv67SSaMJW7pZB06uTX6M3lk11c/RB/C6
> JKPqxkvOmNIX9U8S/G3Y2pYf3/up72IhP0Ugp31iOsz629B2WvEsDYu/0SP61+oZ
> za9HrP2g8OsxVq6SUD3MukmbRVKklvcnro4vk5sOlYI=
> =Jfl+
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
--
*Yifu Guo*
*"Life is an everlasting self-improvement."*
--001a113d632464f708051dd01c3f
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><span style=3D"font-size:12.8px">I like the intend of this=
attempt to bring more=C2=A0clarity=C2=A0to the blocksize debate, however i=
t would be more help to make this a information site about the current outs=
tanding BIPs and summarize their differences rather than voting mechanism.<=
/span><div><span style=3D"font-size:12.8px">=C2=A0(ofcourse the author of t=
he BIPs would "vote" for their own proposals.)</span></div><div><=
br></div><div>It would be good to include supporting and counter statements=
regards to these BIPs on the site.</div><div>in addition to highlight cert=
ain things like pools in china have voiced their opinion that increase shou=
ld happen, and 8mb is something they are comfortable with, which is not dir=
ectly related to a single BIP, but never the less relevant in this discussi=
on.</div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On=
Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 5:35 AM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev <span dir=3D"ltr"=
><<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_bl=
ank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockq=
uote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc =
solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=3D"">-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----=
<br>
Hash: SHA512<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</span><span class=3D"">On 21 August 2015 02:31:51 GMT-07:00, Btc Drak <=
<a href=3D"mailto:btcdrak@gmail.com">btcdrak@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev<br>
><<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-de=
v@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>> What might be valuable is to ask devs to explain what their threat=
<br>
>models are, what should be at the root of their thinking about the<br>
>blocksize.<br>
><br>
>That's exactly what the "Technical Opinion" column is for=
.<br>
<br>
</span>What if could be used for; theres value in being more explicit.<br>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
<br>
iQE9BAEBCgAnIBxQZXRlciBUb2RkIDxwZXRlQHBldGVydG9kZC5vcmc+BQJV1vDG<br>
AAoJEMCF8hzn9Lncz4MIAIMtLLA4q7KJiwrYrpjFWme1ys9iyPZiADJGQWG3qKlH<br>
Q4pEcwWt69jfTUCjLYfegsDW4eEMarejs568iSF70hvGB4OPWrYK3YiM1cWlWtDD<br>
seN3G/4dJjehL7h1Nz+/OTjTlePkguHctRlJTavel8sI7fg356iMJc1Ggm5Q1ZFl<br>
CLrivr/CEO7Qk9Uo5ewhnwConKjLygSyv67SSaMJW7pZB06uTX6M3lk11c/RB/C6<br>
JKPqxkvOmNIX9U8S/G3Y2pYf3/up72IhP0Ugp31iOsz629B2WvEsDYu/0SP61+oZ<br>
za9HrP2g8OsxVq6SUD3MukmbRVKklvcnro4vk5sOlYI=3D<br>
=3DJfl+<br>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
<div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.=
linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail=
man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><div><br></div>-- <br>=
<div class=3D"gmail_signature"><div dir=3D"ltr"><span style=3D"font-size:sm=
all;color:rgb(136,136,136)"><font face=3D"garamond, serif" size=3D"4"><b>Yi=
fu Guo</b></font></span><div style=3D"font-size:small"><font face=3D"verdan=
a, sans-serif"><div style=3D"font-size:13px"><font size=3D"1" color=3D"#333=
333"><i>"Life is an everlasting self-improvement."</i></font></di=
v></font></div></div></div>
</div>
--001a113d632464f708051dd01c3f--
|
