Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DA4C88B for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 10:55:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-ob0-f199.google.com (mail-ob0-f199.google.com [209.85.214.199]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06E6663 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 10:55:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obcji4 with SMTP id ji4so81649294obc.3 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 03:55:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=coinapex.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=VPGQUElQ2x2zV0uoaqOXbNRBGu7mK/J7yyM49eCs4Kc=; b=abW8T8fDWhlHBbSWlCPHjPt3vU/cb0lSV6B6uGHzQ+/FWaYmOCbDstLyF5UGz9QQT5 aK+2Qc4ZE3fCt1URjiV1laIrweXf9r7mcTdQ1tfcZkt14vakmYumNl2OeyTaEBjIyaD2 8haIXVcDd2QW42hAob5wlGJPziHelBNw/9ZEU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=VPGQUElQ2x2zV0uoaqOXbNRBGu7mK/J7yyM49eCs4Kc=; b=CPDPD6lpYze21t5poqE+8d9ouCaKS5/ZvaukIaf/YK8L2KuJgHHXSmUuOFwe+cstB9 i85LZATxfEg9Fo0wxfgT4ELOgScCpEpxhXykzn2GyJJmYrzTYSgl7xTSL5TsenQkYZS5 tSEe04SrWYXX0E63DaxndRSSk2pXigjI0NGIX4ttTv0tgbyiayGXKlwjgYeqcFfZ9Gy1 QZCclCiydf8CRFIa1/b3Kl2IWZWSwE8ts5Xj4aD90rgvV66LP5NbXbotpdSsp0r5l8M1 IBhH29G9t9gwtwOyi0dr2Um461IdjE1QlZSO17YmBgdSEUWMcZk0xWXK2AEA6b6gqr5h 2gpA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn5dFi7nAwUP9nSwFkBUJQpeOGtMq83sBj4Y2H6ioBZQ1xcEvyAC5QWp9+rFG7zbVXN6NcP X-Received: by 10.202.225.136 with SMTP id y130mr6893643oig.16.1440154550322; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 03:55:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.202.84.69 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 03:55:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3B2A58B3-6AF6-4F1C-A6FA-7AEC97F48AD0@petertodd.org> References: <3B2A58B3-6AF6-4F1C-A6FA-7AEC97F48AD0@petertodd.org> From: Yifu Guo Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 06:55:10 -0400 Message-ID: To: Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113d632464f708051dd01c3f X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Core Devs : can you share your thoughts about all BIPs on this website ? X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 10:55:52 -0000 --001a113d632464f708051dd01c3f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I like the intend of this attempt to bring more clarity to the blocksize debate, however it would be more help to make this a information site about the current outstanding BIPs and summarize their differences rather than voting mechanism. (ofcourse the author of the BIPs would "vote" for their own proposals.) It would be good to include supporting and counter statements regards to these BIPs on the site. in addition to highlight certain things like pools in china have voiced their opinion that increase should happen, and 8mb is something they are comfortable with, which is not directly related to a single BIP, but never the less relevant in this discussion. On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 5:35 AM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > > > On 21 August 2015 02:31:51 GMT-07:00, Btc Drak wrote: > >On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev > > wrote: > >> What might be valuable is to ask devs to explain what their threat > >models are, what should be at the root of their thinking about the > >blocksize. > > > >That's exactly what the "Technical Opinion" column is for. > > What if could be used for; theres value in being more explicit. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > iQE9BAEBCgAnIBxQZXRlciBUb2RkIDxwZXRlQHBldGVydG9kZC5vcmc+BQJV1vDG > AAoJEMCF8hzn9Lncz4MIAIMtLLA4q7KJiwrYrpjFWme1ys9iyPZiADJGQWG3qKlH > Q4pEcwWt69jfTUCjLYfegsDW4eEMarejs568iSF70hvGB4OPWrYK3YiM1cWlWtDD > seN3G/4dJjehL7h1Nz+/OTjTlePkguHctRlJTavel8sI7fg356iMJc1Ggm5Q1ZFl > CLrivr/CEO7Qk9Uo5ewhnwConKjLygSyv67SSaMJW7pZB06uTX6M3lk11c/RB/C6 > JKPqxkvOmNIX9U8S/G3Y2pYf3/up72IhP0Ugp31iOsz629B2WvEsDYu/0SP61+oZ > za9HrP2g8OsxVq6SUD3MukmbRVKklvcnro4vk5sOlYI= > =Jfl+ > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > -- *Yifu Guo* *"Life is an everlasting self-improvement."* --001a113d632464f708051dd01c3f Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I like the intend of this= attempt to bring more=C2=A0clarity=C2=A0to the blocksize debate, however i= t would be more help to make this a information site about the current outs= tanding BIPs and summarize their differences rather than voting mechanism.<= /span>
=C2=A0(ofcourse the author of t= he BIPs would "vote" for their own proposals.)
<= br>
It would be good to include supporting and counter statements= regards to these BIPs on the site.
in addition to highlight cert= ain things like pools in china have voiced their opinion that increase shou= ld happen, and 8mb is something they are comfortable with, which is not dir= ectly related to a single BIP, but never the less relevant in this discussi= on.

On= Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 5:35 AM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----=
Hash: SHA512



On 21 August 2015 02:31:51 GMT-07:00, Btc Drak <= btcdrak@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
><bitcoin-de= v@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> What might be valuable is to ask devs to explain what their threat=
>models are, what should be at the root of their thinking about the
>blocksize.
>
>That's exactly what the "Technical Opinion" column is for= .

What if could be used for; theres value in being more explicit.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQE9BAEBCgAnIBxQZXRlciBUb2RkIDxwZXRlQHBldGVydG9kZC5vcmc+BQJV1vDG
AAoJEMCF8hzn9Lncz4MIAIMtLLA4q7KJiwrYrpjFWme1ys9iyPZiADJGQWG3qKlH
Q4pEcwWt69jfTUCjLYfegsDW4eEMarejs568iSF70hvGB4OPWrYK3YiM1cWlWtDD
seN3G/4dJjehL7h1Nz+/OTjTlePkguHctRlJTavel8sI7fg356iMJc1Ggm5Q1ZFl
CLrivr/CEO7Qk9Uo5ewhnwConKjLygSyv67SSaMJW7pZB06uTX6M3lk11c/RB/C6
JKPqxkvOmNIX9U8S/G3Y2pYf3/up72IhP0Ugp31iOsz629B2WvEsDYu/0SP61+oZ
za9HrP2g8OsxVq6SUD3MukmbRVKklvcnro4vk5sOlYI=3D
=3DJfl+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.= linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail= man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev



--
=
Yi= fu Guo
"Life is an everlasting self-improvement."
--001a113d632464f708051dd01c3f--