summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/98/d277f9e291a66b8d3546f9a947a2998d7edd44
blob: 91f95bf38cb661f790948a486a8dd93e9b57a667 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
Return-Path: <hearn@vinumeris.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B852B1C76
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 29 Sep 2015 18:02:07 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-io0-f176.google.com (mail-io0-f176.google.com
	[209.85.223.176])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62B4E28C
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 29 Sep 2015 18:02:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by iofb144 with SMTP id b144so20032439iof.1
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:02:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=vinumeris.com; s=google;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=q3nzKfWR3gJkdUjEmElRBYQMrntKY4RDOAqdlNBl5rY=;
	b=RBXwor0JLJRLp74wNikc08ffOtm+uj0OC7BO7XDJqbGo4Y04PuarIxYwGtz73tNY4B
	MJo7NNfeJqWd3lrAQRihg+ucoWn1YQq/4tX7lS8ioJFkB9rANLQX0GozYK1FbVwRM6j7
	Rl3SFdfIgNEd8KEg+ZLELsu1O6Tu6tBc0ktgU=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=q3nzKfWR3gJkdUjEmElRBYQMrntKY4RDOAqdlNBl5rY=;
	b=mYUDQyAqPPoQjU13oIYYv1lQxPiOTXPiTpaL9JhIouTzQIZpHuaFE2dp0WF2t/4LgT
	1o+p9mZMhuLPpUu80VVPPS5n5nXnYmOSCJzrySlKHlyHodRw75Njw+mrBPX/NcZ0HPiU
	3a2HIRTvekZ27GgGPlI9Rrsoaswy0I1NGSmW3fv/PnwDctMKiNYYaV1VuAdxdL5FbpUJ
	DQws3SPNb0E1HGKz6SGZdXgFhWWYZSrd0Ci3wt+7vBG78LYtfGy2JjIrVKFUlW00bCjX
	RSY/Qx5i5rULfYaPG9I4CfF/RH7AN8C91U/o6nIV5DW3coZRaqNolR1spvfEToZf/gcj
	KLQQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmspL2+Rucg2VK55lVchBKykcBta2o8hQHsRxUl0ppfdMaTcrvAwfKkFAwQR7C59pIRxX2V
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.137.144 with SMTP id t16mr20900ioi.102.1443549726836;
	Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:02:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.226.144 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:02:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAJfRnm4WwtNvChcCGCzDLJZrg3VZqJz-X-XXC0Ftyga3x=P8-w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABsx9T2pDwNBrC-3w8vHeaLYZ6eoNTNU0gW741Y51YL9hU-kiA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJfRnm7gWmXUj=9Dh2o5sEXOMe6Y_4P=naY3cVt1gfLRKOpmnw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABsx9T0YEm7mFYosRVbcG_XgtSi8BbUraGoixy4e2=nyCBeFaA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJfRnm5=yrWE95T3+fzM_PxGxWJ38OnJMVxynTOKK1X9BTrgCg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+w+GKTVzaEqWeR9m2ck6z3WZ_OWJ5hgkqyQhriJDLPVoHzfGQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJfRnm4WwtNvChcCGCzDLJZrg3VZqJz-X-XXC0Ftyga3x=P8-w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 20:02:06 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+w+GKRPNneye6=pJ5R1n3q-8h621gw=UcgyBooJLXuTQ3z1Zg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mike Hearn <hearn@vinumeris.com>
To: Allen Piscitello <allen.piscitello@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113fb1e4af8e850520e69c48
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Is it possible for there to be two chains after a
 hard fork?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 18:02:07 -0000

--001a113fb1e4af8e850520e69c48
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

>
> Mining empty blocks is not fraud.
>

I didn't say it was, sorry, the comma was separating two list items. By
"fraud" I meant double spending. Mining only empty blocks would be a DoS
attack rather than double spending.

--001a113fb1e4af8e850520e69c48
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blo=
ckquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #c=
cc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div><span style=3D"font-size:1=
2.8px">Mining empty blocks is not fraud.</span></div></div></blockquote><di=
v><br></div><div>I didn&#39;t say it was, sorry, the comma was separating t=
wo list items. By &quot;fraud&quot; I meant double spending. Mining only em=
pty blocks would be a DoS attack rather than double spending.</div></div></=
div></div>

--001a113fb1e4af8e850520e69c48--