MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAJfRnm4WwtNvChcCGCzDLJZrg3VZqJz-X-XXC0Ftyga3x=P8-w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABsx9T2pDwNBrC-3w8vHeaLYZ6eoNTNU0gW741Y51YL9hU-kiA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJfRnm7gWmXUj=9Dh2o5sEXOMe6Y_4P=naY3cVt1gfLRKOpmnw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABsx9T0YEm7mFYosRVbcG_XgtSi8BbUraGoixy4e2=nyCBeFaA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJfRnm5=yrWE95T3+fzM_PxGxWJ38OnJMVxynTOKK1X9BTrgCg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+w+GKTVzaEqWeR9m2ck6z3WZ_OWJ5hgkqyQhriJDLPVoHzfGQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJfRnm4WwtNvChcCGCzDLJZrg3VZqJz-X-XXC0Ftyga3x=P8-w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 20:02:06 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+w+GKRPNneye6=pJ5R1n3q-8h621gw=UcgyBooJLXuTQ3z1Zg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mike Hearn <hearn@vinumeris.com>
To: Allen Piscitello <allen.piscitello@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113fb1e4af8e850520e69c48
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Is it possible for there to be two chains after a
 hard fork?
Precedence: list

--001a113fb1e4af8e850520e69c48
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

>
> Mining empty blocks is not fraud.
>

I didn't say it was, sorry, the comma was separating two list items. By
"fraud" I meant double spending. Mining only empty blocks would be a DoS
attack rather than double spending.

--001a113fb1e4af8e850520e69c48
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blo=
ckquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #c=
cc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div><span style=3D"font-size:1=
2.8px">Mining empty blocks is not fraud.</span></div></div></blockquote><di=
v><br></div><div>I didn&#39;t say it was, sorry, the comma was separating t=
wo list items. By &quot;fraud&quot; I meant double spending. Mining only em=
pty blocks would be a DoS attack rather than double spending.</div></div></=
div></div>

--001a113fb1e4af8e850520e69c48--