1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
|
Return-Path: <michele@federici.tech>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DD532359
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 19 Apr 2019 12:12:57 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: delayed 00:18:54 by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from 3.mo173.mail-out.ovh.net (3.mo173.mail-out.ovh.net
[46.105.34.1])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34B75823
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 19 Apr 2019 12:12:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from player698.ha.ovh.net (unknown [10.108.42.5])
by mo173.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85F1DFEA5D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 19 Apr 2019 13:54:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from federici.tech (unknown [91.109.28.130])
(Authenticated sender: michele@federici.tech)
by player698.ha.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 962DA4EDDD69
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 19 Apr 2019 11:53:59 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <298ab7b97f0f34b6ef0e4b8345a942b3d77296d5.camel@federici.tech>
From: Michele Federici <michele@federici.tech>
Reply-To: michele@federici.tech
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 13:53:51 +0200
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512";
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-8Pm9ys6tD2ASbMthVz2o"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5-1
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 13175280710778315854
X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK
X-VR-SPAMSCORE: 0
X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrfeejgdegfecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjpdevjffgvefmvefgnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucehtddtnecu
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 13:57:48 +0000
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Using the same public keys,
the p2sh returned by `addmultisigaddress` differs from the one
returned by `createmultisigaddress`
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 12:12:57 -0000
--=-8Pm9ys6tD2ASbMthVz2o
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi everyone,
I'm writing here because I didn't find any resources in the docs or
somewhere else online explaining this, I don't get if this is a bug or
I'm missing something.
I was working on a function to derive the pay-to-script-hash from a
multisig script and I was checking the results against the bitcoin
core's `addmultisigaddress` output, although I was quite sure that my
implementation was correct, my output address was different.
By chance, I then tried the `createmultisigaddress` method, using the
same public keys, and this time the output was matching with mine.
I thought the outputs of `addmultisigaddress` and
`createmultisigaddress` were supposed to be the same, but instead are
inconsistent from each other:
```
bitcoin-cli addmultisigaddress 1
'["045897fee25bd7c5692510b2f50fcae9aa20fbc4d49d59814f4c7fdb5c4bc6eb1c0c
e382458f9588e922e0d509ed8d34856787380075b00418b02e0bf7c652ef9d","02ac46
c6d74d15e60f4f1035ff07ef740aca1d68d55ba0b8d336a73d7a35858831","0224a4dc
5620714a9ecf67a09583d1e4c04f5bedb8ecea99028da05bb15a2a7e07"]'
{
"address": "36ULucjWUTrDvaJzCyhFoVbDoNS6Zum2Du",
"redeemScript":
"5141045897fee25bd7c5692510b2f50fcae9aa20fbc4d49d59814f4c7fdb5c4bc6eb1c
0ce382458f9588e922e0d509ed8d34856787380075b00418b02e0bf7c652ef9d2102ac4
6c6d74d15e60f4f1035ff07ef740aca1d68d55ba0b8d336a73d7a35858831210224a4dc
5620714a9ecf67a09583d1e4c04f5bedb8ecea99028da05bb15a2a7e0753ae"
}
```
```
bitcoin-cli createmultisig 1
'["045897fee25bd7c5692510b2f50fcae9aa20fbc4d49d59814f4c7fdb5c4bc6eb1c0c
e382458f9588e922e0d509ed8d34856787380075b00418b02e0bf7c652ef9d","02ac46
c6d74d15e60f4f1035ff07ef740aca1d68d55ba0b8d336a73d7a35858831","0224a4dc
5620714a9ecf67a09583d1e4c04f5bedb8ecea99028da05bb15a2a7e07"]'
{
"address": "3GiimyxF1R5VixfBFAbQZbuy9EesD2r6n1",
"redeemScript":
"5141045897fee25bd7c5692510b2f50fcae9aa20fbc4d49d59814f4c7fdb5c4bc6eb1c
0ce382458f9588e922e0d509ed8d34856787380075b00418b02e0bf7c652ef9d2102ac4
6c6d74d15e60f4f1035ff07ef740aca1d68d55ba0b8d336a73d7a35858831210224a4dc
5620714a9ecf67a09583d1e4c04f5bedb8ecea99028da05bb15a2a7e0753ae"
}
```
I was also pretty confused by the fact that the `redeemScript` is the
same, only the addresses are different, and calling `decodescript` with
it I get the same address as `createmultisig`:
```
bitcoin-cli decodescript
"5141045897fee25bd7c5692510b2f50fcae9aa20fbc4d49d59814f4c7fdb5c4bc6eb1c
0ce382458f9588e922e0d509ed8d34856787380075b00418b02e0bf7c652ef9d2102ac4
6c6d74d15e60f4f1035ff07ef740aca1d68d55ba0b8d336a73d7a35858831210224a4dc
5620714a9ecf67a09583d1e4c04f5bedb8ecea99028da05bb15a2a7e0753ae"
{
"asm": "1
045897fee25bd7c5692510b2f50fcae9aa20fbc4d49d59814f4c7fdb5c4bc6eb1c0ce38
2458f9588e922e0d509ed8d34856787380075b00418b02e0bf7c652ef9d
02ac46c6d74d15e60f4f1035ff07ef740aca1d68d55ba0b8d336a73d7a35858831
0224a4dc5620714a9ecf67a09583d1e4c04f5bedb8ecea99028da05bb15a2a7e07 3
OP_CHECKMULTISIG",
"reqSigs": 1,
"type": "multisig",
"addresses": [
"12PfkcWheYsfFddWfHhaXpFDVx78gnKQ9k",
"1AYLXzXd6N2avqW4j8Gyhb8jb2jXvNPyuV",
"1PWsxtcBMRHTSX2L7wrXgwnFigHD3KhbFT"
],
"p2sh": "3GiimyxF1R5VixfBFAbQZbuy9EesD2r6n1"
}
```
I don't understand, how can this be possible?
Thank you,
Michele
--=-8Pm9ys6tD2ASbMthVz2o
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEzBAABCgAdFiEE8LpnnP1O6lVY/D5FTcim1Buz1vgFAly5ts8ACgkQTcim1Buz
1vg/yAf8CtrM6NKtUyEZEnQEg2QLONJO8zx+sJDhzBranxgIlpqxxLS6sWIqAwjP
gNyiQKwNa9e0hWBinUWyVXQIl/s9xmX7P2cOVtCQ8T4tyfyy285ALBCJ1rSKuAWG
4eDtqAwzjd9xyJ0Q8wAdxHf53SvjF01Qdj0HFfMWCF7Xm74kDqZ/oWWClxivGPfC
va+hnnuFhhxkoCxejkBRQUUJH7QnT0cE+BGT2D2Dj+Odj2pXcXdFK39qHrkZc62Y
zpXbXIGlXB0QWIVVsHfw/3iw69iAxY9pOEgbDlLMmpjgFMlu5a+p0O2phbLOEoas
ZbRlYIjYbjDuP8VdREWWvHao2ckjFA==
=AZ1Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-8Pm9ys6tD2ASbMthVz2o--
|
