1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
|
Return-Path: <steven.j.lee@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 911CEC37;
Wed, 23 Oct 2019 17:45:14 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-yw1-f49.google.com (mail-yw1-f49.google.com
[209.85.161.49])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 118C287E;
Wed, 23 Oct 2019 17:45:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-yw1-f49.google.com with SMTP id w140so7738862ywd.0;
Wed, 23 Oct 2019 10:45:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=uFBXOVZgwoRghwpvAJ3ClyeEWCeFFSJvxO2+90ZhI7Q=;
b=Jam2YOYJRpj8As554qBVsbIgRZnn8vOoPE60Gxb6M0UecRZX6/vrheSjR77KGmx6Ef
ErPC+wHKH328NiDrWyt8yrU1FEEukIa5zN4WWOak5/ODFAUoPR3QwDv4PeCe9YYkZjYm
B5DaJyBAGLuzZWOmxR+c42PZHyldIetOLHga+0Aj9AcrnuOQdl4S58DPhMUGYp36J6KX
AXXZO4ABTj+vimBWksAIC9c+Ty7M68rHHe0UCnrBexYTcsOMfCH3tGNx+S7vFTZbw82G
xO/LPD69nQa56JXTlyRGYn7pnRqQM61P8r6OYSZigSpGpbTP/E7SqbkyRRWt6x2fyEtc
z9Vg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=uFBXOVZgwoRghwpvAJ3ClyeEWCeFFSJvxO2+90ZhI7Q=;
b=ZzFYMolPR6UdnZdkscZ+ht1+HawKUF0S6RL/9ulgraeLYhX47Mxs5eEQI8m9bSC8fa
W3mefOKFfZm3+/9qZGCZV3bDEVg2vcTxn89Om7iUe4LAJaSANII2v7eP5xeNnu5WgRi6
SrzO1B80jxVZLlI3YT5Evcoz2uXOJjHPIDi8/FB7KO0x0HgUd1VtgBa/6I55fiJ6jxJw
sO2jEtVJV35ZsXkqzfevm1cfVJ3tMcHuZFUs+CnlM9YXLLJSQrQIXyX7CwnoqM+2GWQn
rLlikvnpw0cw0QpSGI/MSs5sn6LEzm5Sp+nAF7Y09i+/cJUfl6kP9VnWMY2xYXgyRrIz
2B4w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXgoV1dSi9oZjGA/P44J99S9h0XmEvCajyXQwm3RkireoCYKOP7
eSNJzesHV77f5iFuqk+zZHq5U184Wk5tWM6D5xk8Q+qneYA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzuWrS7RR03O8HXwuyCKG+QWyBUIeiwpgjC8G8S1T/OkiD+W/J4XYhk0iMGNCcuUBpH1CouIrHUKg0tUOpdPbU=
X-Received: by 2002:a0d:cb11:: with SMTP id n17mr3964189ywd.197.1571852712485;
Wed, 23 Oct 2019 10:45:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Steve Lee <steven.j.lee@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 10:44:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CABu3BAePQVzGX=1ugTBqwzvbB6jEKC4LGG-Mwpki5iyTvs5d9Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009129020595977ab5"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 17:54:54 +0000
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Sign up for Taproot BIP review by October 30
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 17:45:14 -0000
--0000000000009129020595977ab5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello everyone,
The schnorr/taproot/tapscript BIPs are ready for review at this point, and
we want to get as much in-depth review from as broad a range of people as
we can before we go further on implementation/deployment. Reviewing the
BIPs is hard in two ways: not many people are familiar with reviewing BIPs
in the first place, and there are a lot of concepts involved in the three
BIPs for people to get their heads around.
This is a proposal <https://github.com/ajtowns/taproot-review> for a
structured review period. The idea is that participants will be given some
guidance/structure for going through the BIPs, and at the end should be
able to either describe issues with the BIP drafts that warrant changes, or
be confident that they=E2=80=99ve examined the proposals thoroughly enough =
to give
an =E2=80=9CACK=E2=80=9D that the drafts should be formalised and move forw=
ards into
implementation/deployment phases.
Benefits of participating:
* Deeply understand schnorr and taproot
* Be a stakeholder in Bitcoin consensus development
* Support/safeguard decentralisation of Bitcoin protocol development
* Have fun!
If you are interested in participating, please sign up here
<https://forms.gle/stnJvHQHREdkaxkS8 >.
Special thanks to AJ Towns for doing most of the heavy lifting to get this
going!
Steve
--0000000000009129020595977ab5
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">Hello everyone,<div><br></div><div>The schnorr/taproot/tap=
script BIPs are ready for review at this point, and we want to get as much =
in-depth review from as broad a range of people as we can before we go furt=
her on implementation/deployment. Reviewing the BIPs is hard in two ways: n=
ot many people are familiar with reviewing BIPs in the first place, and the=
re are a lot of concepts involved in the three BIPs for people to get their=
heads around.<br><br><a href=3D"https://github.com/ajtowns/taproot-review"=
>This is a proposal</a> for a structured review period. The idea is that pa=
rticipants will be given some guidance/structure for going through the BIPs=
, and at the end should be able to either describe issues with the BIP draf=
ts that warrant changes, or be confident that they=E2=80=99ve examined the =
proposals thoroughly enough to give an =E2=80=9CACK=E2=80=9D that the draft=
s should be formalised and move forwards into implementation/deployment pha=
ses.<br><br>Benefits of participating:<br>* Deeply understand schnorr and t=
aproot<br>* Be a stakeholder in Bitcoin consensus development<br>* Support/=
safeguard decentralisation of Bitcoin protocol development<br>* Have fun!<b=
r></div><div><div><br></div></div><div>If you are interested in participati=
ng, <a href=3D"https://forms.gle/stnJvHQHREdkaxkS8=C2=A0">please sign up he=
re</a>.</div><div><br></div><div>Special thanks to AJ Towns for doing most =
of the heavy lifting to get this going!</div><div><br></div><div>Steve</div=
><div><br></div></div>
--0000000000009129020595977ab5--
|