Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 911CEC37; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 17:45:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-yw1-f49.google.com (mail-yw1-f49.google.com [209.85.161.49]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 118C287E; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 17:45:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yw1-f49.google.com with SMTP id w140so7738862ywd.0; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 10:45:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=uFBXOVZgwoRghwpvAJ3ClyeEWCeFFSJvxO2+90ZhI7Q=; b=Jam2YOYJRpj8As554qBVsbIgRZnn8vOoPE60Gxb6M0UecRZX6/vrheSjR77KGmx6Ef ErPC+wHKH328NiDrWyt8yrU1FEEukIa5zN4WWOak5/ODFAUoPR3QwDv4PeCe9YYkZjYm B5DaJyBAGLuzZWOmxR+c42PZHyldIetOLHga+0Aj9AcrnuOQdl4S58DPhMUGYp36J6KX AXXZO4ABTj+vimBWksAIC9c+Ty7M68rHHe0UCnrBexYTcsOMfCH3tGNx+S7vFTZbw82G xO/LPD69nQa56JXTlyRGYn7pnRqQM61P8r6OYSZigSpGpbTP/E7SqbkyRRWt6x2fyEtc z9Vg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=uFBXOVZgwoRghwpvAJ3ClyeEWCeFFSJvxO2+90ZhI7Q=; b=ZzFYMolPR6UdnZdkscZ+ht1+HawKUF0S6RL/9ulgraeLYhX47Mxs5eEQI8m9bSC8fa W3mefOKFfZm3+/9qZGCZV3bDEVg2vcTxn89Om7iUe4LAJaSANII2v7eP5xeNnu5WgRi6 SrzO1B80jxVZLlI3YT5Evcoz2uXOJjHPIDi8/FB7KO0x0HgUd1VtgBa/6I55fiJ6jxJw sO2jEtVJV35ZsXkqzfevm1cfVJ3tMcHuZFUs+CnlM9YXLLJSQrQIXyX7CwnoqM+2GWQn rLlikvnpw0cw0QpSGI/MSs5sn6LEzm5Sp+nAF7Y09i+/cJUfl6kP9VnWMY2xYXgyRrIz 2B4w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXgoV1dSi9oZjGA/P44J99S9h0XmEvCajyXQwm3RkireoCYKOP7 eSNJzesHV77f5iFuqk+zZHq5U184Wk5tWM6D5xk8Q+qneYA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzuWrS7RR03O8HXwuyCKG+QWyBUIeiwpgjC8G8S1T/OkiD+W/J4XYhk0iMGNCcuUBpH1CouIrHUKg0tUOpdPbU= X-Received: by 2002:a0d:cb11:: with SMTP id n17mr3964189ywd.197.1571852712485; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 10:45:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Steve Lee Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 10:44:49 -0700 Message-ID: To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org, lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009129020595977ab5" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 17:54:54 +0000 Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Sign up for Taproot BIP review by October 30 X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 17:45:14 -0000 --0000000000009129020595977ab5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello everyone, The schnorr/taproot/tapscript BIPs are ready for review at this point, and we want to get as much in-depth review from as broad a range of people as we can before we go further on implementation/deployment. Reviewing the BIPs is hard in two ways: not many people are familiar with reviewing BIPs in the first place, and there are a lot of concepts involved in the three BIPs for people to get their heads around. This is a proposal for a structured review period. The idea is that participants will be given some guidance/structure for going through the BIPs, and at the end should be able to either describe issues with the BIP drafts that warrant changes, or be confident that they=E2=80=99ve examined the proposals thoroughly enough = to give an =E2=80=9CACK=E2=80=9D that the drafts should be formalised and move forw= ards into implementation/deployment phases. Benefits of participating: * Deeply understand schnorr and taproot * Be a stakeholder in Bitcoin consensus development * Support/safeguard decentralisation of Bitcoin protocol development * Have fun! If you are interested in participating, please sign up here . Special thanks to AJ Towns for doing most of the heavy lifting to get this going! Steve --0000000000009129020595977ab5 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello everyone,

The schnorr/taproot/tap= script BIPs are ready for review at this point, and we want to get as much = in-depth review from as broad a range of people as we can before we go furt= her on implementation/deployment. Reviewing the BIPs is hard in two ways: n= ot many people are familiar with reviewing BIPs in the first place, and the= re are a lot of concepts involved in the three BIPs for people to get their= heads around.

This is a proposal for a structured review period. The idea is that pa= rticipants will be given some guidance/structure for going through the BIPs= , and at the end should be able to either describe issues with the BIP draf= ts that warrant changes, or be confident that they=E2=80=99ve examined the = proposals thoroughly enough to give an =E2=80=9CACK=E2=80=9D that the draft= s should be formalised and move forwards into implementation/deployment pha= ses.

Benefits of participating:
* Deeply understand schnorr and t= aproot
* Be a stakeholder in Bitcoin consensus development
* Support/= safeguard decentralisation of Bitcoin protocol development
* Have fun!

If you are interested in participati= ng, please sign up he= re.

Special thanks to AJ Towns for doing most = of the heavy lifting to get this going!

Steve

--0000000000009129020595977ab5--