summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/8b/23f8b7f31b2146bc3ed7875913ebda50bdc81b
blob: 00094d9b8179b36babdc21161bec36669fb7e709 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
Return-Path: <opetruzel@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5133AB47
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sat,  3 Jun 2017 21:05:27 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-oi0-f54.google.com (mail-oi0-f54.google.com
	[209.85.218.54])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71B50FE
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sat,  3 Jun 2017 21:05:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oi0-f54.google.com with SMTP id l18so125078993oig.2
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sat, 03 Jun 2017 14:05:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
	:cc; bh=/39RlL73DX92kPfSd2My/pocc37LfstKIKxSE7KKzqg=;
	b=GPk8SkxE+u+VZ+FSNSyxvf08P9PVM4SUNOiD/8p3I2x1o1F6zLU4zNsunAOReV7tGj
	+kksGV4SRudHwDsj20d2uAdoVbq/VKJ7LYfNgXLPU2AsqM98+pmx3ne/LvJMUu9GYg3n
	V3ZEVsNd6fcug2tNDCzSHHym5e9WgE9wSPEQOYyG+Uc+hJLv5c43DfralEM3wwkJ4ncz
	fZFkMkh9dFI+CF4Aa7PjnOALA8PzZNg+zNQkPnY3Q4rSOJFZlklHPQnTcrNfR88qj0V3
	ttHfVi7invwIHASpfymv57X70Obni6hj/aqX2yzt/GMmvxPx878QdnUefhkvk0qtC3JC
	n4tA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:cc;
	bh=/39RlL73DX92kPfSd2My/pocc37LfstKIKxSE7KKzqg=;
	b=AzRnptbCMvUXkrUTj8xkeGIvsISdZqBZ/OdFWoprjkohyQSwOmnN8cRMNkmZYgox7+
	fmf+SOMQ7VSl6KqjOlFVe/tOCJsf9xFIzRzCfbcfaY+6P8wLlsdRQ2BqDorMVIQjGr7V
	wNdxGPH4Qam0lN9v4PuKyCy/V0ClCcqkjCbSe3OvgrZe4PO6z/IJ+Wf+akAArB/FhU9R
	1U/aUq24rh8BPOleQE85FSf4NYHR4D5Dbcmc0oEDHVpdWAVnZvSie3E3vCpMMzIaevsb
	mJNzfLxyAFmUIApiNLwGnOFlEmTu8QqkgW3f24UOc0BcCmfAwnHcR1sTrGn0Vb6hXXMv
	mJbQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcAcHzzdqkIEJZ9SLJFaKMpgu4lYl/+hHUSY4UWNow1QrRbQffD5
	GohS87jMvMoN1wYQgZnhfhl5bBCw1w==
X-Received: by 10.202.212.205 with SMTP id l196mr7807102oig.4.1496523924797;
	Sat, 03 Jun 2017 14:05:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.16.67 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 14:05:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.157.16.67 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 14:05:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAJowKgLmhWG6YjobTDS-F+ER2sr1tW38tjQZy=5LHt-YikEj6g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKzdR-oN6tGvGSb04_awCf=Jsf3wgKJN5xUhCr8G2D2W9YgJww@mail.gmail.com>
	<1CF1FD5D-8D29-4783-823F-B3F588D5C5CE@mattcorallo.com>
	<CAD1TkXse5O6nEw9-EPsNp4c56YJ+OnM=F1uf8w+tyB=_+hFzFQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKzdR-rFJNOZ856rA_q8C=zEUj_X561OSOwW+KZr4nRJ51w3HA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABm2gDrAHo2P7t6SjituURqMUqs_=Lbp7X=g_j8nGoNKMKCRKQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJowKg+aYUCgBu0nD9U63jm2SunGeqdqOwiMgnTSfE9JmNJAQw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKzdR-qQvSz0WA3e9DoT-N+wwsFSjWu0G+iMcvJR1zmpXdHNZQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJowKgLmhWG6YjobTDS-F+ER2sr1tW38tjQZy=5LHt-YikEj6g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Oliver Petruzel <opetruzel@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 17:05:23 -0400
Message-ID: <CALhpmH1RHRWagteFTm+_HM4t2wBQEV60qO0AkL3_pPKPy2D+tw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Erik Aronesty <erik@q32.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113d3c6aef7f87055114a0b1"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, 
	RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 21:34:50 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Segwit2Mb - combined soft/hard fork - Request For
	Comments
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 21:05:27 -0000

--001a113d3c6aef7f87055114a0b1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

>>2.1MB capacity in August via segwit, with 4MB weight, and 4.2MB capacity
in December with 8MB<<

I'm not sure how many people to not of the draft BIP I submitted to the
list in early April. It was essentially a combination of Gavin's BIP 109,
Adam's 2-4-8 idea, and something I added to SegWit that I call "Discount
Governing."

It basically takes the idea of gradual increases one step farther: a
gradual increase of both the Total weight and SegWit discount rate over a
period of X years (a schedule of Flag Day + X blocks increases).

Would this be something that some in the dev community might consider
if/when SegWit is combined with a block increase?

Original draft here:
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/
2017-April/013984.html

Ollie

--001a113d3c6aef7f87055114a0b1
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"auto"><div style=3D"font-family:sans-serif;font-size:18.048px" =
dir=3D"auto"><div style=3D"margin:16px 0px"><div><div dir=3D"auto"><div sty=
le=3D"color:purple"><div dir=3D"auto">&gt;&gt;2.1MB capacity in August via =
segwit, with 4MB weight, and 4.2MB capacity in December with 8MB&lt;&lt;</d=
iv><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div></div><div dir=3D"auto">I&#39;m not sure how=
 many people to not of the draft BIP I submitted to the list in early April=
. It was essentially a combination of Gavin&#39;s BIP 109, Adam&#39;s 2-4-8=
 idea, and something I added to SegWit that I call &quot;Discount Governing=
.&quot;</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">It basically tak=
es the idea of gradual increases one step farther: a gradual increase of bo=
th the Total weight and SegWit discount rate over a period of X years (a sc=
hedule of Flag Day + X blocks increases).</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div>=
<div dir=3D"auto">Would this be something that some in the dev community mi=
ght consider if/when SegWit is combined with a block increase?</div><div di=
r=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Original draft here:</div><div dir=
=3D"auto"><a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-de=
v/2017-April/013984.html" style=3D"text-decoration-line:none;color:rgb(66,1=
33,244)">https://lists.linuxfoundation.<wbr>org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/<wbr>=
2017-April/013984.html</a></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"aut=
o">Ollie</div></div></div></div><div style=3D"height:0px"></div></div><br><=
/div>

--001a113d3c6aef7f87055114a0b1--