Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5133AB47 for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 21:05:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-oi0-f54.google.com (mail-oi0-f54.google.com [209.85.218.54]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71B50FE for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 21:05:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f54.google.com with SMTP id l18so125078993oig.2 for ; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 14:05:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/39RlL73DX92kPfSd2My/pocc37LfstKIKxSE7KKzqg=; b=GPk8SkxE+u+VZ+FSNSyxvf08P9PVM4SUNOiD/8p3I2x1o1F6zLU4zNsunAOReV7tGj +kksGV4SRudHwDsj20d2uAdoVbq/VKJ7LYfNgXLPU2AsqM98+pmx3ne/LvJMUu9GYg3n V3ZEVsNd6fcug2tNDCzSHHym5e9WgE9wSPEQOYyG+Uc+hJLv5c43DfralEM3wwkJ4ncz fZFkMkh9dFI+CF4Aa7PjnOALA8PzZNg+zNQkPnY3Q4rSOJFZlklHPQnTcrNfR88qj0V3 ttHfVi7invwIHASpfymv57X70Obni6hj/aqX2yzt/GMmvxPx878QdnUefhkvk0qtC3JC n4tA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/39RlL73DX92kPfSd2My/pocc37LfstKIKxSE7KKzqg=; b=AzRnptbCMvUXkrUTj8xkeGIvsISdZqBZ/OdFWoprjkohyQSwOmnN8cRMNkmZYgox7+ fmf+SOMQ7VSl6KqjOlFVe/tOCJsf9xFIzRzCfbcfaY+6P8wLlsdRQ2BqDorMVIQjGr7V wNdxGPH4Qam0lN9v4PuKyCy/V0ClCcqkjCbSe3OvgrZe4PO6z/IJ+Wf+akAArB/FhU9R 1U/aUq24rh8BPOleQE85FSf4NYHR4D5Dbcmc0oEDHVpdWAVnZvSie3E3vCpMMzIaevsb mJNzfLxyAFmUIApiNLwGnOFlEmTu8QqkgW3f24UOc0BcCmfAwnHcR1sTrGn0Vb6hXXMv mJbQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcAcHzzdqkIEJZ9SLJFaKMpgu4lYl/+hHUSY4UWNow1QrRbQffD5 GohS87jMvMoN1wYQgZnhfhl5bBCw1w== X-Received: by 10.202.212.205 with SMTP id l196mr7807102oig.4.1496523924797; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 14:05:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.16.67 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 14:05:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.157.16.67 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 14:05:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1CF1FD5D-8D29-4783-823F-B3F588D5C5CE@mattcorallo.com> From: Oliver Petruzel Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 17:05:23 -0400 Message-ID: To: Erik Aronesty Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113d3c6aef7f87055114a0b1" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 21:34:50 +0000 Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Segwit2Mb - combined soft/hard fork - Request For Comments X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 21:05:27 -0000 --001a113d3c6aef7f87055114a0b1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" >>2.1MB capacity in August via segwit, with 4MB weight, and 4.2MB capacity in December with 8MB<< I'm not sure how many people to not of the draft BIP I submitted to the list in early April. It was essentially a combination of Gavin's BIP 109, Adam's 2-4-8 idea, and something I added to SegWit that I call "Discount Governing." It basically takes the idea of gradual increases one step farther: a gradual increase of both the Total weight and SegWit discount rate over a period of X years (a schedule of Flag Day + X blocks increases). Would this be something that some in the dev community might consider if/when SegWit is combined with a block increase? Original draft here: https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/ 2017-April/013984.html Ollie --001a113d3c6aef7f87055114a0b1 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>>2.1MB capacity in August via = segwit, with 4MB weight, and 4.2MB capacity in December with 8MB<<

I'm not sure how= many people to not of the draft BIP I submitted to the list in early April= . It was essentially a combination of Gavin's BIP 109, Adam's 2-4-8= idea, and something I added to SegWit that I call "Discount Governing= ."

It basically tak= es the idea of gradual increases one step farther: a gradual increase of bo= th the Total weight and SegWit discount rate over a period of X years (a sc= hedule of Flag Day + X blocks increases).

=
Would this be something that some in the dev community mi= ght consider if/when SegWit is combined with a block increase?

Original draft here:

Ollie

<= /div> --001a113d3c6aef7f87055114a0b1--