1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
|
Return-Path: <lists@achow101.com>
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 950A4C0032
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 11 Oct 2023 23:59:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A2082540
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 11 Oct 2023 23:59:27 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org E1A2082540
Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key,
unprotected) header.d=achow101.com header.i=@achow101.com header.a=rsa-sha256
header.s=protonmail2 header.b=g9ALbJQr
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 9V-uADBqXMTE
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 11 Oct 2023 23:59:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-4018.proton.ch (mail-4018.proton.ch [185.70.40.18])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A6D78248C
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 11 Oct 2023 23:59:26 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 2A6D78248C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=achow101.com;
s=protonmail2; t=1697068763; x=1697327963;
bh=1J+FaYb9WHxUmZ5iR78R2Ha7D384uj0oREVbDmPTkMM=;
h=Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:
Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:
Message-ID:BIMI-Selector;
b=g9ALbJQr4VAZ8XQBnv7IpF/HMnq52mVtUIZSwON3roAhdkuHd0FeAsNp7/3YPzWW3
TPvrXDujBjRNBm1QDFwWGalKsCo36WKQcVd67zz7hJTOyGrJVQjJV+BMm9zwytITWU
cVEdxG9cuZq8hMEazPFsIqYhKKThS6+Iocwrwdg6QZaIkb078u2qT7n+v3IPQGVVEj
PgdXwCtIg97DuemcVFi72GZtcf8xijn+FAvFWpHpneD+tlB1/3Gt8s45/b4h8nr/gv
wMHuw2kxT2ujnqJrvi66FOHbBBpVNKVEmlj9Z5tFtqJeBkCkWFkl2Wzu2sCDbW3FLW
O42w41U/o+S8A==
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 23:59:16 +0000
To: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
From: Andrew Chow <lists@achow101.com>
Message-ID: <5ebdc1ea-583e-472f-a7ff-6ae8976bf0fb@achow101.com>
In-Reply-To: <ZSc0Luwg3rpNvkfJ@erisian.com.au>
References: <c3aad7de-ec6d-407a-b33e-b52663523ef7@achow101.com>
<ZSc0Luwg3rpNvkfJ@erisian.com.au>
Feedback-ID: 53660394:user:proton
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 02:14:19 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP for MuSig2 PSBT Fields
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 23:59:28 -0000
On 10/11/2023 07:47 PM, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 10:28:37PM +0000, Andrew Chow via bitcoin-dev wro=
te:
>> I've written up a BIP draft for MuSig2 PSBT fields. It can be viewed at
>> https://github.com/achow101/bips/blob/musig2-psbt/bip-musig2-psbt.mediaw=
iki.
>=20
> I was hoping to see adaptor signature support in this; but it seems that'=
s
> also missing from BIP 327?
This is the first time I've heard of that, so it wasn't something that I=20
considered adding to the BIP. Really the goal was to just be able to use=20
BIP 327.
But that doesn't preclude a future BIP that specifies how to use adaptor=20
signatures and to have additional PSBT fields for it. It doesn't look=20
like those are mutually exclusive in any way or that the fields that=20
I've proposed wouldn't still work.
I don't know enough about the topic to really say much on whether or how=20
such fields would work.
> FWIW, "participant" is typoed a bunch ("particpant")and the tables are
> hard to read: you might consider putting the description as a separate
> row? eg:
>=20
> https://github.com/ajtowns/bips/blob/202310-table/bip-musig2-psbt.media=
wiki
Yes, I've been making some minor fixes throughout the day, and I'll=20
probably take your suggestion for the tables. Mediawiki tables are the=20
bane of my existence.
Andrew
|
