Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 950A4C0032 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 23:59:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A2082540 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 23:59:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org E1A2082540 Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=achow101.com header.i=@achow101.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=protonmail2 header.b=g9ALbJQr X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9V-uADBqXMTE for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 23:59:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-4018.proton.ch (mail-4018.proton.ch [185.70.40.18]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A6D78248C for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 23:59:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 2A6D78248C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=achow101.com; s=protonmail2; t=1697068763; x=1697327963; bh=1J+FaYb9WHxUmZ5iR78R2Ha7D384uj0oREVbDmPTkMM=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=g9ALbJQr4VAZ8XQBnv7IpF/HMnq52mVtUIZSwON3roAhdkuHd0FeAsNp7/3YPzWW3 TPvrXDujBjRNBm1QDFwWGalKsCo36WKQcVd67zz7hJTOyGrJVQjJV+BMm9zwytITWU cVEdxG9cuZq8hMEazPFsIqYhKKThS6+Iocwrwdg6QZaIkb078u2qT7n+v3IPQGVVEj PgdXwCtIg97DuemcVFi72GZtcf8xijn+FAvFWpHpneD+tlB1/3Gt8s45/b4h8nr/gv wMHuw2kxT2ujnqJrvi66FOHbBBpVNKVEmlj9Z5tFtqJeBkCkWFkl2Wzu2sCDbW3FLW O42w41U/o+S8A== Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 23:59:16 +0000 To: Anthony Towns , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion From: Andrew Chow Message-ID: <5ebdc1ea-583e-472f-a7ff-6ae8976bf0fb@achow101.com> In-Reply-To: References: Feedback-ID: 53660394:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 02:14:19 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP for MuSig2 PSBT Fields X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 23:59:28 -0000 On 10/11/2023 07:47 PM, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 10:28:37PM +0000, Andrew Chow via bitcoin-dev wro= te: >> I've written up a BIP draft for MuSig2 PSBT fields. It can be viewed at >> https://github.com/achow101/bips/blob/musig2-psbt/bip-musig2-psbt.mediaw= iki. >=20 > I was hoping to see adaptor signature support in this; but it seems that'= s > also missing from BIP 327? This is the first time I've heard of that, so it wasn't something that I=20 considered adding to the BIP. Really the goal was to just be able to use=20 BIP 327. But that doesn't preclude a future BIP that specifies how to use adaptor=20 signatures and to have additional PSBT fields for it. It doesn't look=20 like those are mutually exclusive in any way or that the fields that=20 I've proposed wouldn't still work. I don't know enough about the topic to really say much on whether or how=20 such fields would work. > FWIW, "participant" is typoed a bunch ("particpant")and the tables are > hard to read: you might consider putting the description as a separate > row? eg: >=20 > https://github.com/ajtowns/bips/blob/202310-table/bip-musig2-psbt.media= wiki Yes, I've been making some minor fixes throughout the day, and I'll=20 probably take your suggestion for the tables. Mediawiki tables are the=20 bane of my existence. Andrew