summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/7b/cdf62b51c4d162255c27fbdaeb664826b2df9e
blob: 0a197458a54f021af25dc887f65171317686af4d (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
Return-Path: <rmcc4444@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0433AEF1
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 24 Jan 2018 00:43:09 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-qt0-f177.google.com (mail-qt0-f177.google.com
	[209.85.216.177])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9114284
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 24 Jan 2018 00:43:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qt0-f177.google.com with SMTP id s3so6265162qtb.10
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 23 Jan 2018 16:43:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
	h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
	bh=cG5xcxsXgEemXU86VB+W1v6R9Iv0iSvBSxJ5YcmJM30=;
	b=KxcPdTjewMYKXACaGxohhOz1dmTS5mWSLgynR3nH+WKwkPJfex2vvaGHsAH5VI9qSA
	mOaIZHd8/13sUM/pKoqb0sbr15BrDGMromsSCqAA0dElKPzj0ajzoQQecYJre2HQWKeZ
	UT8ccmOH7Gbe6nnKX49QTdsUh+xQmVi05vVRSCzDn9xJ842vO+6u4Vls42XsFxUgZbFH
	wdNd+H8uXHqAb2Y/J8ty2e21K+r2PbeuS4m1pICFbuu/keWi32nhwv8T0W8xS0v2lWCq
	T+AxVg1+pAXt/dLJGX56atDbA2nUpzADQ3ZMhhWJiyka41K0Jm2xjTysnIHUOlPcEsjh
	c1lw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
	bh=cG5xcxsXgEemXU86VB+W1v6R9Iv0iSvBSxJ5YcmJM30=;
	b=S/b4NymDNJVXz4xtP6enBl2VwPSy/PnzpkbNFc85qvUnpZJoj1pQCVICfIXhhYXwo7
	9iXfOw8NkA727suBg6bkq6RA8yO4U82qc0eI/Wg2/j0oUFALJJORqND8fSVM7MCYd3g6
	H3b2HuEHYR8NwuRIqAogkYFn9PY/84/HqoPg+m90IlZVn5IUCg7JfWyi+8/nZTsqusRN
	JqmQfOpZeGRkvMED3Hfi/C9uwV/zU/7dLZdpMvPKVH8jq03VpWHGa55FnzZyg9o7pq1H
	PxxYu5yMK3CUsGwj4ZQeSQoebVDelEcYn5LIZ5piuKs5no88i6znHBYwDO8zq3euiRif
	9eTg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytcGKPoDjKh+KdAmu6n2cMAmDT+cn8nsyhP5FAHcP9BLgjjP7E0T
	b6gSQLdkfgaNitEB9pUS23RWlAZza2NJiLFiD20DHw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x224qtVC97eyGiWkfawxtjYYc1xBCJH2sXLAvnakqPQaVY+PxQXvCzrwm8/CEIiFBwfC97cJaJ3ex7Y3e+YZ0wBM=
X-Received: by 10.200.22.53 with SMTP id p50mr6488657qtj.284.1516754587399;
	Tue, 23 Jan 2018 16:43:07 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: rmcc4444 <rmcc4444@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 00:42:56 +0000
Message-ID: <CAMZHxzofEfKyTEYYwjWVCWcJoE-K_skRTTFZ9XGb-WsnUQA6rQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045d6cb264ba0905637af208"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 01:29:27 +0000
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] 2 step confirmation system
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 00:43:09 -0000

--f403045d6cb264ba0905637af208
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

I know from speaking to my friends not involved with Bitcoin that two of
their major concerns are as follows:

1. They are afraid if they fat finger the address there is nothing they can
do about it and not get their Bitcoin back.

and/or

2. They would like to at least have the option to use some sort of 2 step
confirmation system when dealing ith people they do not know. For example,
after sending the Bitcoin to a seller they would like to be able to do a
final approval of the tm transaction. If the 2 people involved in the
transaction approve of it within X hours, the coin returns to the original
person. This system would basically act as an escrow.

This 2 step system could work with both of these.

I apologize if this is the incorrect place to post this. I did not know
where else to share these thoughts.

Thanks for your time.



-- 


** This message was likely sent using voice to text. Please ignore any
typos.**

--f403045d6cb264ba0905637af208
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I know from speaking to my friends not involved with Bitcoin that two of th=
eir major concerns are as follows:=C2=A0<div><br></div><div>1. They are afr=
aid if they fat finger the address there is nothing they can do about it an=
d not get their Bitcoin back.</div><div><br></div><div>and/or</div><div><br=
></div><div>2. They would like to at least have the option to use some sort=
 of 2 step confirmation system when dealing ith people they do not know. Fo=
r example, after sending the Bitcoin to a seller they would like to be able=
 to do a final approval of the tm transaction. If the 2 people involved in =
the transaction approve of it within X hours, the coin returns to the origi=
nal person. This system would basically act as an escrow.=C2=A0</div><div><=
br></div><div>This 2 step system could work with both of these.</div><div><=
br></div><div>I apologize if this is the incorrect place to post this. I di=
d not know where else to share these thoughts.</div><div><br></div><div>Tha=
nks for your time.=C2=A0</div><div><br></div><br clear=3D"all"><br>-- <br><=
div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_signature" data-smartmail=3D"gmail_signature=
"><div dir=3D"ltr"><p dir=3D"ltr"><br><span style=3D"color:rgb(34,34,34);fo=
nt-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px">** This message was likely sen=
t using voice to text. Please ignore any typos.**</span></p>
</div></div>

--f403045d6cb264ba0905637af208--