Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0433AEF1 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 00:43:09 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-qt0-f177.google.com (mail-qt0-f177.google.com [209.85.216.177]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9114284 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 00:43:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qt0-f177.google.com with SMTP id s3so6265162qtb.10 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 16:43:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=cG5xcxsXgEemXU86VB+W1v6R9Iv0iSvBSxJ5YcmJM30=; b=KxcPdTjewMYKXACaGxohhOz1dmTS5mWSLgynR3nH+WKwkPJfex2vvaGHsAH5VI9qSA mOaIZHd8/13sUM/pKoqb0sbr15BrDGMromsSCqAA0dElKPzj0ajzoQQecYJre2HQWKeZ UT8ccmOH7Gbe6nnKX49QTdsUh+xQmVi05vVRSCzDn9xJ842vO+6u4Vls42XsFxUgZbFH wdNd+H8uXHqAb2Y/J8ty2e21K+r2PbeuS4m1pICFbuu/keWi32nhwv8T0W8xS0v2lWCq T+AxVg1+pAXt/dLJGX56atDbA2nUpzADQ3ZMhhWJiyka41K0Jm2xjTysnIHUOlPcEsjh c1lw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=cG5xcxsXgEemXU86VB+W1v6R9Iv0iSvBSxJ5YcmJM30=; b=S/b4NymDNJVXz4xtP6enBl2VwPSy/PnzpkbNFc85qvUnpZJoj1pQCVICfIXhhYXwo7 9iXfOw8NkA727suBg6bkq6RA8yO4U82qc0eI/Wg2/j0oUFALJJORqND8fSVM7MCYd3g6 H3b2HuEHYR8NwuRIqAogkYFn9PY/84/HqoPg+m90IlZVn5IUCg7JfWyi+8/nZTsqusRN JqmQfOpZeGRkvMED3Hfi/C9uwV/zU/7dLZdpMvPKVH8jq03VpWHGa55FnzZyg9o7pq1H PxxYu5yMK3CUsGwj4ZQeSQoebVDelEcYn5LIZ5piuKs5no88i6znHBYwDO8zq3euiRif 9eTg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytcGKPoDjKh+KdAmu6n2cMAmDT+cn8nsyhP5FAHcP9BLgjjP7E0T b6gSQLdkfgaNitEB9pUS23RWlAZza2NJiLFiD20DHw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x224qtVC97eyGiWkfawxtjYYc1xBCJH2sXLAvnakqPQaVY+PxQXvCzrwm8/CEIiFBwfC97cJaJ3ex7Y3e+YZ0wBM= X-Received: by 10.200.22.53 with SMTP id p50mr6488657qtj.284.1516754587399; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 16:43:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: rmcc4444 Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 00:42:56 +0000 Message-ID: To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045d6cb264ba0905637af208" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 01:29:27 +0000 Subject: [bitcoin-dev] 2 step confirmation system X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 00:43:09 -0000 --f403045d6cb264ba0905637af208 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I know from speaking to my friends not involved with Bitcoin that two of their major concerns are as follows: 1. They are afraid if they fat finger the address there is nothing they can do about it and not get their Bitcoin back. and/or 2. They would like to at least have the option to use some sort of 2 step confirmation system when dealing ith people they do not know. For example, after sending the Bitcoin to a seller they would like to be able to do a final approval of the tm transaction. If the 2 people involved in the transaction approve of it within X hours, the coin returns to the original person. This system would basically act as an escrow. This 2 step system could work with both of these. I apologize if this is the incorrect place to post this. I did not know where else to share these thoughts. Thanks for your time. -- ** This message was likely sent using voice to text. Please ignore any typos.** --f403045d6cb264ba0905637af208 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I know from speaking to my friends not involved with Bitcoin that two of th= eir major concerns are as follows:=C2=A0

1. They are afr= aid if they fat finger the address there is nothing they can do about it an= d not get their Bitcoin back.

and/or
2. They would like to at least have the option to use some sort= of 2 step confirmation system when dealing ith people they do not know. Fo= r example, after sending the Bitcoin to a seller they would like to be able= to do a final approval of the tm transaction. If the 2 people involved in = the transaction approve of it within X hours, the coin returns to the origi= nal person. This system would basically act as an escrow.=C2=A0
<= br>
This 2 step system could work with both of these.
<= br>
I apologize if this is the incorrect place to post this. I di= d not know where else to share these thoughts.

Tha= nks for your time.=C2=A0



--
<= div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_signature" data-smartmail=3D"gmail_signature= ">


** This message was likely sen= t using voice to text. Please ignore any typos.**

--f403045d6cb264ba0905637af208--