summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/67/11a99dc032b8de57484202d0a9386d1786c734
blob: 64e15c366872ca82ba2e470d16b375485e6332a8 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
Return-Path: <info@AndySchroder.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC036323
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 29 Jun 2015 01:49:42 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from uschroder.com (uschroder.com [74.142.93.202])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D21BA7
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 29 Jun 2015 01:49:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.253.4] (cpe-74-132-161-228.kya.res.rr.com
	[74.132.161.228])
	by uschroder.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 900F022E43E2C;
	Sun, 28 Jun 2015 21:49:41 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <5590A432.9080102@AndySchroder.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 21:49:38 -0400
From: Andy Schroder <info@AndySchroder.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com>, bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
References: <CAD2Ti2-QChRZYZDSH1avit3snCLMws2UNmHQ_aY5O4txCS3AGg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD2Ti2-QChRZYZDSH1avit3snCLMws2UNmHQ_aY5O4txCS3AGg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
OpenPGP: id=2D44186B;
	url=http://andyschroder.com/static/AndySchroder.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="V8uCbUXJxVWaeVch9SuoMk5MWX2AWShqp"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,URIBL_BLACK
	autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Mailing List Administrivia - GPG, Archives,
 Breakage, TODO, mirrors, etc
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 01:49:42 -0000

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--V8uCbUXJxVWaeVch9SuoMk5MWX2AWShqp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Although I'd say your writing style is a bit unfriendly and hard to=20
identify/unclear at the specifics of some of your complaints, I do agree =

with many of your points.

I really have no idea what format the .txt.gz files are in that are on=20
the current archive. If you unzip them, they are not text tiles.

gmane was able to change the subscription of the previous list to the=20
current list. So, anyone who had a newsreader setup, it should be=20
working again. There is some gap in their archive at the beginning of=20
the archive, as well as last week while the list was transitioned. They=20
requested a link to a single mbox file archive that they can use to=20
restore the list archive in it's entirety. Anyone know how we can get=20
this? The reference to another mailing list below=20
(https://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/) has such a link on its=20
archive page. It looks like the same interface so maybe that feature can =

just be turned on? I'm not sure if it gzips the mbox file on the fly=20
whenever an http request is made or if it has some schedule and may be=20
missing a few of the most recent messages?


Also, regarding the footer, if it can't be changed on a per user basis,=20
I'd vote to get rid of it. Anyone with a reasonably powered brain can go =

to lists.linuxfoundation.org and find a way to get to the bitcoin-dev=20
mailing list page. The information provided in the footer is also=20
included in the email message headers as well. It's also included in the =

welcome e-mail when someone subscribes to the list.




Andy Schroder

On 06/27/2015 06:21 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Frank Flores <frankf44@gmail.com> wrot=
e:
>> If you're going to go through the trouble of signing your public email=
s ...
> ... then you should also demand that the official archives of your
> favorite lists preserve them and their verifiability in the supposedly
> canonical reference "mbox" format that they distribute.
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Wladimir J. van der Laan
> <laanwj@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Subject: [bitcoin-dev] New GPG signing key for Bitcoin Core binary rel=
eases
> http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-June/009045=
=2Ehtml
> http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-June.txt.gz=

>
> As you can clearly see, both the HTML archives and the "mbox"
> archives have corrupted this message, it will not verify. Do not
> try to say this case is trivial, the problem itself is not trivial,
> it's gratuitous, and it applies to all matching messages... text,
> code, binary inline... that's dangerous.
>
> Do not try to say this corruption prevents spam, it does not.
> Spammers simply subscribe to the list and harvest everything
> efficiently in realtime... no webcrawling overhead, no stale
> addresses. Obfuscation is futile.
>
> This misfeature needs to be disabled.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:57 AM, Warren Togami Jr. <wtogami@gmail.com>=
 wrote:
>> archives will be exported
>> and imported into the new list server
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Andy Schroder <info@andyschroder.com> =
wrote:
>> I'm not sure if anyone has submitted a request for gmane
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 5:35 PM, s7r <s7r@sky-ip.org> wrote:
>> Do we have all the archives imported? I run several full nodes and
>> mirrors for open source projects, if you think it's useful, I can
>> provide a mirror for the mail list archives.
> Yes... these other mirrors, archives, analysis, journalism, and
> interfaces are useful. However, as it is now, there are no useful
> authoritative sources for them to seed from... they're all corrupt.
> And any subscribed realtime sources, though nice, are subject to
> downtime, administrative and other unrecoverable gaps. Your mirror
> project is a fine idea, you should demand that the pristine historical
> sources be made publicly available. Not just for you, but for everyone.=

>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015, grarpamp wrote:
>> ...
> As before, the current "mbox" archives are broken and not useful...
>
> a) They corrupt message data, messages are unverifiable, another exampl=
e...
>     http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-June/00=
9132.html
>     http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-June.tx=
t.gz
> b) They are missing the minimum set of original headers necessary
>     for fully replyable, threadable, sortable, searchable, context
>     preserving and direct use by users MUA's in their local environment=
:
>     (Date, From, To, Cc, Subject, Message-ID, In-Reply-To, References)
> c) They do not include attachments (patches, signatures, images, crypto=
,
>     data) that are absolutely necessary to the context and archives
>     of all lists. Instead they stupidly throw them away to "web links"
>     which results not only in uselessness of the so called "mbox"
>     version, but in many thousands of needless fetches by archive
>     users and indexers. And hours of wasted work attempting to
>     postprocess them into usable form.
>     Valuable content lost from the "mbox" files this June alone:
>      418 attachment.html
>      106 attachment.sig
>        6 attachment.jpe
>        4 attachment.png
>        2 attachment.bin
> d) There appear to be at least 15 instances of unescaped '^From '
>     in the "mbox". Regeneration with current mailman may fix. One such
>     case is here:
>     http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2014-January=
/004245.html
>     http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2014-January=
=2Etxt.gz
>
>
>
> Please fix all the above mentioned issues by providing the full raw
> archives in regularly updated [gzip/7z] mbox format. The internet
> thanks you :)
>
> Example, compare the "Downloadable version"s here:
> http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/
> https://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/
> https://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2015-February/006820.html
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Andy Schroder <info@andyschroder.com> =
wrote:
>> Regarding message footers and the subject prefix
> Yes, they're also corruptive and space wasting clutter, for and by
> the clueless :( Both of them should be turned off.
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>
>



--V8uCbUXJxVWaeVch9SuoMk5MWX2AWShqp
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVkKQyAAoJEDT679stRBhrLDkH/0eRE8np2R8AI9gsU6V1kT3j
tOgzgah3pgm1R1+DpDciS7FSPNFCTBi4QhCMzH+EGPIS3T3RVgR2cV3+8MlhtNIm
srbijS+Z2JB5Y3NPZt5O4Xl/3JSbMC9yvVu4/29av92zTz0Id5CgFU8ivN2cXJEO
8DB5jfyyLVVwAeKVXj6daEV1W1RxilccIT7pacgiMjobep4fzHzXtCpXzuATI570
HQepRaYj70wWBlzKtNUunb5h7ImIQFN0CZVpWwu6qAIRNCHuEGrW+V94C/x32wTp
rIz0ZupwK+oniijDIHKFYjwDeuvtsIlZlz2804v8sygsdEmihw/T8ttR8jl6Cis=
=drzp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--V8uCbUXJxVWaeVch9SuoMk5MWX2AWShqp--