1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
|
Return-Path: <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5D48C002D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 24 Apr 2022 12:44:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF1844161B
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 24 Apr 2022 12:44:29 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org (amavisd-new);
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=jtimon-cc.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id oBa-T6bcSqGK
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 24 Apr 2022 12:44:28 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from mail-yb1-xb2d.google.com (mail-yb1-xb2d.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2d])
by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9399F41619
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 24 Apr 2022 12:44:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb2d.google.com with SMTP id r189so22557228ybr.6
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 24 Apr 2022 05:44:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=jtimon-cc.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=mxYdo89lmg96sFBaQJwv3My4LHulIH9jQSyJ23i/j5c=;
b=tUD0bYfVIFg/Y43haH9HjgOpYGQ/8WRZ94u05W9XV0FfCcHTYoJkqLsp+Gok8URNMe
ZbfXzPXrvXeJBWIp1UIMvJayoYpJL8t7VThDfk8tswx0KGjRTYGcBTIgBQT9+MKMqNGu
VISBOqHx5QS43SSQrVQneUI221kkXiuUjtdn5ZHAlJzPuiEiq5AA+4hGoAxPFnjzgMAe
+f10vAEsbVib4DRPq9DtlA8xb8VZM2w0//Q+gbxxloKZd1oNVqryTOjoXZ5Wlnv3q4Jc
9qW+TGj43lwzjuO2u5q0GTtFxzkBP0/1gxARYc5bWNXLQeiu9wIMyxcicsvPYzqRXAMJ
+AmQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=mxYdo89lmg96sFBaQJwv3My4LHulIH9jQSyJ23i/j5c=;
b=KdIA7Er1sjqoyIb3sjPEn80j5yosbbVN9bMzdCEjDC23iLvsAWc5oYQy5nnHwRSSp2
9Xusm/0wzGBX5qHm8BDg4X2F2+X3AG7VqF1CRPoZ9bnR49BtiJ/xujHV6DMlGEm68WOz
3sZcj8Hn8zuNiHd560QeNCb1atSo6jZ9dIXspnZUbaC19scIt0XGW/00aokln8WJem9S
Q+SKsOlsPKlsiQGYq/d5OkPqBxFenYmoPXVOfiu/ugbMefOq/Rr8MpCBALr5F1CxK6gs
SpXwcYNM/0FLugllOEfBHthEBeVDPhO7l8GGsCexW8qy28UZcMKKw1u0PFu+kLxKIbEB
aGrw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530m+R+S8zCT9TRmPOdPpk3LijF+NmI1xT+1fR66jaPl9y/kEDay
vZ381hk1lH5SJrHc3H5o28jXs0wen4TDAo8wXSEzzA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzuxYdfSxWAUeBtzsQ0gBCzTh5pZUrnKDZwtYaB+UPspOLmEyBlc7hkCtMLX9eSZqejG1alCxy8AnkvTl/Xw00=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:107:0:b0:645:d3ed:3cb7 with SMTP id
7-20020a250107000000b00645d3ed3cb7mr9902675ybb.26.1650804267448; Sun, 24 Apr
2022 05:44:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220315154549.GA7580@erisian.com.au>
<CABm2gDpK8eRx3ATbxkF5ic1usUdT4vKiPJyjmPVc-HEOGkxm-g@mail.gmail.com>
<20220322234951.GB11179@erisian.com.au>
<CABm2gDoC5Y=o6Vu7urzBoioVmXBf+YBLg95w-kupx9nidRDBPg@mail.gmail.com>
<20220326014546.GA12225@erisian.com.au>
<CABm2gDpMxN0sBCpcbmvYsQbdsGp=JRjAyLhsd6BWyAxdCY95+A@mail.gmail.com>
<20220330042106.GA13161@erisian.com.au>
<CABm2gDrsZ9ZimFTkNrdj+wr7328h2N2GmRCawq8xYv3BqyHNow@mail.gmail.com>
<20220411130522.GA3633@erisian.com.au>
<CABm2gDqw7ZSLwuFvWstLpkRAFT_4DLWkhNFBLW8m_E46_VWG3A@mail.gmail.com>
<20220424121429.GA7363@erisian.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <20220424121429.GA7363@erisian.com.au>
From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2022 14:44:16 +0200
Message-ID: <CABm2gDo0=psMAKY6Pvfp8b-RvAJdUabiESJpff_yzgwmy7cigQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f4936b05dd65d1fd"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 24 Apr 2022 18:57:45 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Speedy Trial
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2022 12:44:30 -0000
--000000000000f4936b05dd65d1fd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 2:14 PM Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 12:13:08PM +0100, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n wrote:
> > You're not even considering user resistance in your cases.
>
> Of course I am. Again:
>
No, you're relying on miners to stop bad proposals.
> > > My claim is that for *any* bad (evil, flawed, whatever) softfork, the=
n
> > > attempting activation via bip8 is *never* superior to speedy trial,
> > > and in some cases is worse.
> > >
> > > If I'm missing something, you only need to work through a single
> example
> > > to demonstrate I'm wrong, which seems like it ought to be easy... But
> > > just saying "I disagree" and "I don't want to talk about that" isn't
> > > going to convince anyone.
>
> The "some cases" where bip8 with lot=3Dtrue is *worse* than speedy trial
> is when miners correctly see that a bad fork is bad.
>
> Under *any* other circumstance, when they're used to activate a bad soft
> fork, speedy trial and bip8 are the same. If a resistance method works
> against bip8, it works against speedy trial; if it fails against speedy
> trial, it fails against bip8.
>
You're wrong.
> > Sorry for the aggressive tone, but I when people ignore some of my poin=
ts
> > repeteadly, I start to wonder if they do it on purpose.
>
> Perhaps examine the beam in your own eye.
>
Yeah, whether you do that yourself or not: sorry, it's over.
> Cheers,
> aj
>
--000000000000f4936b05dd65d1fd
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">=
<div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 2:14 PM Antho=
ny Towns <<a href=3D"mailto:aj@erisian.com.au">aj@erisian.com.au</a>>=
wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px =
0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On Sun, =
Apr 24, 2022 at 12:13:08PM +0100, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n wrote:<br>
> You're not even considering user resistance in your cases. <br>
<br>
Of course I am. Again:<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>No, you're r=
elying on miners to stop bad proposals.<br></div><div>=C2=A0</div><blockquo=
te class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px =
solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
> > My claim is that for *any* bad (evil, flawed, whatever) softfork,=
then<br>
> > attempting activation via bip8 is *never* superior to speedy tria=
l,<br>
> > and in some cases is worse.<br>
> ><br>
> > If I'm missing something, you only need to work through a sin=
gle example<br>
> > to demonstrate I'm wrong, which seems like it ought to be eas=
y... But<br>
> > just saying "I disagree" and "I don't want to =
talk about that" isn't<br>
> > going to convince anyone.<br>
<br>
The "some cases" where bip8 with lot=3Dtrue is *worse* than speed=
y trial<br>
is when miners correctly see that a bad fork is bad.<br>
<br>
Under *any* other circumstance, when they're used to activate a bad sof=
t<br>
fork, speedy trial and bip8 are the same. If a resistance method works<br>
against bip8, it works against speedy trial; if it fails against speedy<br>
trial, it fails against bip8.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>You'r=
e wrong.<br></div><div>=C2=A0</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=
=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding=
-left:1ex">
> Sorry for the aggressive tone, but I when people ignore some of my poi=
nts<br>
> repeteadly, I start to wonder if they do it on purpose. <br>
<br>
Perhaps examine the beam in your own eye.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><d=
iv>Yeah, whether you do that yourself or not: sorry, it's over.</div><d=
iv>=C2=A0</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0p=
x 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
Cheers,<br>
aj<br>
</blockquote></div></div>
--000000000000f4936b05dd65d1fd--
|
