summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/4a/ee6281225a6086d8ab1006359d7c3d94a3a730
blob: ef23669a662c40154f4246fe57a189542ae5e0c1 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::138])
 by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D6F7C002D
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sun, 24 Apr 2022 15:22:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 059A78272C
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sun, 24 Apr 2022 15:22:37 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.802
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.802 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, BITCOIN_OBFU_SUBJ=1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org (amavisd-new);
 dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=petertodd.org header.b="Zr5rurCI";
 dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
 header.b="uCu3QfMc"
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id wdOfzdLL_M_Z
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sun, 24 Apr 2022 15:22:36 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [64.147.123.25])
 by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58A8D8264A
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sun, 24 Apr 2022 15:22:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45])
 by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC4CA3200AC9;
 Sun, 24 Apr 2022 11:22:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162])
 by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 24 Apr 2022 11:22:34 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=petertodd.org;
 h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from
 :from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
 :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1650813753; x=
 1650900153; bh=NmPcInO1HOQMFVSowVAwFr59eosHkVRowtbhZ1cdXZA=; b=Z
 r5rurCIYMggpy3+Shp0TwGOJV4qyXVuXBCHkxqjaImqxJ6wq+HY5bKb2xbhyhuq+
 /k7sF6/5WVLp7KsUXnNFyqtZsCeg6WGXQHxurU6jhZl4dmMmNaA46CuCC2yYtUHW
 jprnUPHIbvtGD8+aIAUcufR59WjF8RoiibAGCS6cKzaumQ3eaRDESRdrvq+2TYR3
 zof52c9R9EHjRvkqyoCSlwO3jrHU81c8FWth1b2cbwAeegRHLSpASuEbSJexlWVd
 SxuuGf/9k5eL6MWMduIbFtWH5U0XCak41851W0PTNhYCZ3wVHcxP5aDHQSQXN3Jt
 UBtOToHC+ehPX/bTUlyXA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding
 :content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to
 :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject
 :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender
 :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1650813753; x=1650900153; bh=NmPcInO1HOQMF
 VSowVAwFr59eosHkVRowtbhZ1cdXZA=; b=uCu3QfMc4YvH79jsIi1na9Wpul+df
 LU+mLLvtzC0HHXmNkfPo6IK5I2+JuWdB4VP9sBoLC42Nw4viDdo1scMildjJNgKW
 z7nPqjLeib0JJFa5boIGr1ARntf3Lz+IS3LeE4dk7b06kJIzrEw/UqmbQp9jUAsm
 8t5+hH2vOkXh6gAjicUldpDFQ8ArFozIZd6PDsPVQcZJTamGvaZnEaQbu6LJ5zhs
 1i16uSKVpJZTskEXbrd0tsRFIx5rme1FxRgrMbgucBvoYDNH7FU5HTdQ2eYVAY5A
 ZQvycKmI5eF+eZdaRjB+Ra1nfyUPPKa/bAYDfF3MAYQcE1O/ytCYUDJMQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:OWtlYuDWqHpmnRfNsZtxx-zlvdU08HX2CKDXjmUCufmVg0alo70n1Q>
 <xme:OWtlYojZZoljwmHggAVV2effcP3J7u4RgrHPD-NaH3r3nVAjLlc4YBHhs8_uEyNW5
 DIRwFU4ZePqmw7XHl8>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:OWtlYhkn-1h9SMtfg-iVE3k_6M5PMa3DN44jUADbjykJnbP4uk694lvwTdc2RrM>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrtdelgdeklecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf
 curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu
 uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc
 fjughrpeffhffvvefufggjfhfkgggtgfesthhqmhdttderjeenucfhrhhomheprfgvthgv
 rhcuvfhougguuceophgvthgvsehpvghtvghrthhouggurdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrghtth
 gvrhhnpeejgfejveduudejvddtleefhfeugffhleetjeffgeetheelvdefvedttdffvddt
 vdenucffohhmrghinhepnhhithhtvghrrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd
 enucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepphgvthgvsehpvghtvghrthhouggurdhorhhg
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:OWtlYsyH_4WtDCqMQyodYJE6t2XP5J7-wpsadq4t-zurBhR6CD8-Dg>
 <xmx:OWtlYjTeIfbb-6skTU_Ws3UGQZ0lzK-5iqCRJ4b3JktS9UFL6p-bwg>
 <xmx:OWtlYnbw5KrfEL3fqvsM2k3KvbmvgvRnK2Y_MFJ_R68FusMn2wJq5g>
 <xmx:OWtlYuf9rumazekGzSxL8tK073vuuJmlMrifdvnMrXcykfSG1QAQag>
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun,
 24 Apr 2022 11:22:32 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2022 17:22:29 +0200
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: alicexbt <alicexbt@protonmail.com>,
 Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
 alicexbt via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
 Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>, "dave@dtrt.org" <dave@dtrt.org>
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <R95icCQeG6oNu4uNppxVTceaMmZzOQhUD40HhOXkuQCOzUY_P5uM1F1AGBejdydrSjl4RYE538VWiDHeGx3YcaS0S-z_q9v5UaCK_Y4b5TE=@protonmail.com>
References: <64a34b4d46461da322be51b53ec2eb01@dtrt.org>
 <202204210205.47678.luke@dashjr.org>
 <R95icCQeG6oNu4uNppxVTceaMmZzOQhUD40HhOXkuQCOzUY_P5uM1F1AGBejdydrSjl4RYE538VWiDHeGx3YcaS0S-z_q9v5UaCK_Y4b5TE=@protonmail.com>
Message-ID: <4516A563-CF6E-4AF1-8449-318EDCE177B2@petertodd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Automatically reverting ("transitory") soft forks,
	e.g. for CTV
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2022 15:22:37 -0000



On April 21, 2022 5:10:02 AM GMT+02:00, alicexbt via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-=
dev@lists=2Elinuxfoundation=2Eorg> wrote:
>@DavidHarding
>
>Interesting proposal to revert consensus changes=2E Is it possible to do =
this for soft forks that are already activated?
>
>Example: Some users are not okay with witness discount in segwit transact=
ions
>
>https://nitter=2Enet/giacomozucco/status/1513614380121927682

That specific case isn't a good example as reverting the discount would ac=
tually be a soft fork, as it is a tightening of existing rules=2E In fact, =
it'd be a block size decrease=2E