1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
|
Return-Path: <eric@voskuil.org>
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::136])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F065BC002D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 18 Jul 2022 21:48:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA1D960F6B
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 18 Jul 2022 21:48:50 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org CA1D960F6B
Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org;
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=voskuil-org.20210112.gappssmtp.com
header.i=@voskuil-org.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.a=rsa-sha256
header.s=20210112 header.b=WduB7HdI
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 37QoNre83evC
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 18 Jul 2022 21:48:49 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 8E4F860B74
Received: from mail-pg1-x52d.google.com (mail-pg1-x52d.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52d])
by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E4F860B74
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 18 Jul 2022 21:48:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52d.google.com with SMTP id 23so11801922pgc.8
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 18 Jul 2022 14:48:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=voskuil-org.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112;
h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id
:references:cc:in-reply-to:to;
bh=Df7aJEqi75bfUO4PlHISok/hCWB0x26GG93FfjfcYbs=;
b=WduB7HdIshxU9fTJI2tVsafn4bZVXWhgYU4F3LfCiSEd3xefHe1Fb9i1Oc841akfUc
sfYfDF/0Jgeh7SZeo+VGkozEnEi+kbrWrJRqHV3ReLxN1XHtSIy3tQGYxmbs1YjDUoaM
L7HowhhXqKs7a0w2rU41jUQIYDp+LAAnIxVplM5BU0I21HTqzXpaBuHJkeQaACRjKjVz
oSTyj+apaIfglD6fhvAMDJyux5VevA0WUnnKB2IEMpLZxcdiZnJREyLYpU+EKIEIJPBs
8ej5sUAV/ZH1yjU0+FF/ea/RwNTtudDRmSH57DAc/FyRVX4tCA/rvaxAg0xYONiqr/WO
s7xw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version
:subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to;
bh=Df7aJEqi75bfUO4PlHISok/hCWB0x26GG93FfjfcYbs=;
b=Rh4c8+fpba6d1jLrvnuSJzZ604eitBnNHEFX7RtjAiBVa3IlmJgLtVn4LO4xaCkc1L
aKp+VV1vncuf9UAS3O/fwzyWtlSikQAak9uNdrjG916aSatTzvqUVKqFQRejQ9s4xN3K
oj0FaHa650gJbVyigKoIEtuXlzjWcTWIDxy5c4nLA3zZaOGRrT42zYGtj+iiUysJ4LSZ
vr/8nVS3HkyxBsIjZ/HXIiBa+Qnfbl9wqACOzUVU2ERLsSitMCxbUe7rg6PyCAtgcSNQ
JhXSfO0DgF4KVnARKRPACjJa6iR1VTB6uhpP2WIVMCQaWaDZg2rukuWlrv9wgMWO17fN
tSHw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora8Pr7sJ/J0dpz0AKO006hL+cDvdJraW08ya1Ihv55/0kSuEQrMA
XefR37fMHasUO1UNWTOXk9yKqy2Tn73lKw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1t2vIsp/8TP75UHlk/zR9n4qZSZrYv+na+3IKwn80rTmtBMNgifKzTEMfDtJIcwVxWfaxnvBA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:a26:b0:528:9831:d935 with SMTP id
p38-20020a056a000a2600b005289831d935mr29811567pfh.25.1658180928863;
Mon, 18 Jul 2022 14:48:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2600:380:7042:731b:7c82:f0d0:f47a:123c])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
l18-20020a170902d35200b0016405375132sm10040440plk.25.2022.07.18.14.48.48
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128);
Mon, 18 Jul 2022 14:48:48 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary=Apple-Mail-F8FB5EB5-191F-41D4-8367-9D46D1693F42
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Eric Voskuil <eric@voskuil.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 14:48:46 -0700
Message-Id: <6A72F2DB-C07C-4953-B820-03613941D72E@voskuil.org>
References: <CAJowKgJb99LAQ=KGEcU2a1jJBPGBNh7=zW177NpS-vxvKZyO0A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJowKgJb99LAQ=KGEcU2a1jJBPGBNh7=zW177NpS-vxvKZyO0A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Erik Aronesty <erik@q32.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (19F77)
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 21:48:51 -0000
--Apple-Mail-F8FB5EB5-191F-41D4-8367-9D46D1693F42
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> On Jul 18, 2022, at 14:14, Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@list=
s.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>=20
> =EF=BB=BF
>>=20
>> subsidy to directly tie miner revenue to the total value of Bitcoin=20
>> makes it not exactly how we want to incentivise a service that keeps=20
>>=20
>=20
> again, this is meaningless. if the fees aren't enough to keep bitcoin s=
ecure for large transactions, then large holders are incentivised to mine
Yes, this is another way to pay the tx fee - you mine at cost sufficient to o=
verpower the censor. You are spending the block reward in getting your txs c=
onfirmed, and that=E2=80=99s your fee.
But unless you are mining full blocks of only your own transactions, this im=
plies that you are accepting these higher fees on censored txs from others. O=
therwise you are simply mining at a loss, which we cannot use as a rational b=
asis for security.
And therefore this reduces to the simple fact that tx fees are what provides=
censorship resistance, whether you mine your own or others=E2=80=99.
e
> that's it.
>=20
> it's not complicated
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
--Apple-Mail-F8FB5EB5-191F-41D4-8367-9D46D1693F42
Content-Type: text/html;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"content-type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3D=
utf-8"></head><body dir=3D"auto"><div dir=3D"ltr"></div><div dir=3D"ltr"><br=
></div><div dir=3D"ltr"><blockquote type=3D"cite">On Jul 18, 2022, at 14:14,=
Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>=
wrote:<br><br></blockquote></div><blockquote type=3D"cite"><div dir=3D"ltr"=
>=EF=BB=BF<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"g=
mail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,=
204,204);padding-left:1ex"><br>subsidy to directly tie miner revenue to the t=
otal value of Bitcoin <br>
makes it not exactly how we want to incentivise a service that keeps <br><br=
></blockquote><div><br></div><div>again, this is meaningless. if=
the fees aren't enough to keep bitcoin secure for large transact=
ions, then large holders are incentivised to mine</div></div></div></div></b=
lockquote><div><br></div><div>Yes, this is another way to pay the tx fee - y=
ou mine at cost sufficient to overpower the censor. You are spending the blo=
ck reward in getting your txs confirmed, and that=E2=80=99s your fee.</div><=
div><br></div><div>But unless you are mining full blocks of only your own tr=
ansactions, this implies that you are accepting these higher fees on censore=
d txs from others. Otherwise you are simply mining at a loss, which we canno=
t use as a rational basis for security.</div><div><br></div><div>And therefo=
re this reduces to the simple fact that tx fees are what provides censorship=
resistance, whether you mine your own or others=E2=80=99.</div><div><br></d=
iv><div>e</div><br><blockquote type=3D"cite"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"lt=
r"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div>that's it.</div><div><br></div><div>it's n=
ot complicated</div></div></div>
<span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>bitcoi=
n-dev mailing list</span><br><span>bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</sp=
an><br><span>https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev<=
/span><br></div></blockquote></body></html>=
--Apple-Mail-F8FB5EB5-191F-41D4-8367-9D46D1693F42--
|
