1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
|
Return-Path: <murch@murch.one>
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5607FC0037
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:25:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC5DC85306
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:25:34 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org DC5DC85306
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id Ajaint-sCDaW
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:25:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from farbauti.uberspace.de (farbauti.uberspace.de [185.26.156.235])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A9EF85303
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:25:33 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 8A9EF85303
Received: (qmail 15169 invoked by uid 989); 25 Jan 2024 21:25:30 -0000
Authentication-Results: farbauti.uberspace.de;
auth=pass (plain)
Received: from unknown (HELO unkown) (::1)
by farbauti.uberspace.de (Haraka/3.0.1) with ESMTPSA;
Thu, 25 Jan 2024 22:25:30 +0100
Message-ID: <3384566b-8c6d-4d8c-91b8-a45f17aaec68@murch.one>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 16:25:28 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
References: <Zalsq+Nq7RRr/CAR@petertodd.org>
<9a89eca8-61fd-4156-825d-c9b718dc3034@murch.one>
<Za7xkUsoeACMv6Fw@petertodd.org>
From: Murch <murch@murch.one>
In-Reply-To: <Za7xkUsoeACMv6Fw@petertodd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Rspamd-Bar: -
X-Rspamd-Report: BAYES_HAM(-1.819496) XM_UA_NO_VERSION(0.01) MIME_GOOD(-0.1)
X-Rspamd-Score: -1.909496
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=murch.one; s=uberspace;
h=from; bh=D92uogOjPW+xupkw6ela295s4vIyLxjLhY/3693c/bU=;
b=diU7VwCP04LtR1QSGP3PZW+ppWekiCoQr9W4dco3vcgm1I1QVA0yVNdW96gP3fiUWrm0+6nfFT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Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] One-Shot Replace-By-Fee-Rate
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:25:35 -0000
Hi Peter,
On 1/22/24 17:52, Peter Todd wrote:
> An even simpler fix would be to just require that all unconfirmed inputs
> in a replacement come from the *same* replaced transaction. That would
> make certain rare, but economically viable, replacements infeasible. But
> it would definitely fix the issue.
The replacements spend at most a single unconfirmed input in my infinite
relay cycle example.
Murch
|
