Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5607FC0037 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:25:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC5DC85306 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:25:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org DC5DC85306 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.199 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ajaint-sCDaW for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:25:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from farbauti.uberspace.de (farbauti.uberspace.de [185.26.156.235]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A9EF85303 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:25:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 8A9EF85303 Received: (qmail 15169 invoked by uid 989); 25 Jan 2024 21:25:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: farbauti.uberspace.de; auth=pass (plain) Received: from unknown (HELO unkown) (::1) by farbauti.uberspace.de (Haraka/3.0.1) with ESMTPSA; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 22:25:30 +0100 Message-ID: <3384566b-8c6d-4d8c-91b8-a45f17aaec68@murch.one> Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 16:25:28 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion References: <9a89eca8-61fd-4156-825d-c9b718dc3034@murch.one> From: Murch In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Bar: - X-Rspamd-Report: BAYES_HAM(-1.819496) XM_UA_NO_VERSION(0.01) MIME_GOOD(-0.1) X-Rspamd-Score: -1.909496 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=murch.one; s=uberspace; h=from; bh=D92uogOjPW+xupkw6ela295s4vIyLxjLhY/3693c/bU=; b=diU7VwCP04LtR1QSGP3PZW+ppWekiCoQr9W4dco3vcgm1I1QVA0yVNdW96gP3fiUWrm0+6nfFT YOJkG1V8RWjq/OzSNn/+jBCGJjs02jATpWoDBvdOrVjGMH8cVyMvROgcfoK1b8l/HXdo4Mv8lPW/ bl1GMzti6mI1V4osiEGp1B/M1qOHQJIKh8mGI2PLAYhWZ6+edUuk4VjtR/mEIzKXLML8oj4hTLQq MdSZo00+969AF7/8/g3JAT4APxLEDtV4mfll/PhhntQ8lRqqtIaAKrtmuDzhAUTuPSjWJJYeC4x1 D8jzxC8FGQLsQwBmlYFzTdMNIrdKgQ+ogXZ28mmbD0+jMvnUJ8kCq47hCQWlfn/zUBZEPthSsiKL E+i4F4K+lgSw7kUReczKh2qjSH8ZPt6Xeqr2fnGgUsSySjante3P3HgpDPw1MeY9hsYqJnrXFuKT A5mHep93huzoDHO3c+1PX80k1cXOQE3X3cqti7Srgn+ssgLRN0QcpzlPRBNOSTncItBAa14iD/eA HbQnigOG6iO791aiPh8+owot5FPIrP0Td+ZYz2zd3rJlZDUHJne0/zcIU9zWEJsXiglUe8ZdYWl1 QwzFhdQ56bF5RDOXYvjgfHrmN4X8bTf+nb42QjG0u1aH5nKfcVKt2T0HtGHQSr7wOqIgHhLUerev U= Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] One-Shot Replace-By-Fee-Rate X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:25:35 -0000 Hi Peter, On 1/22/24 17:52, Peter Todd wrote: > An even simpler fix would be to just require that all unconfirmed inputs > in a replacement come from the *same* replaced transaction. That would > make certain rare, but economically viable, replacements infeasible. But > it would definitely fix the issue. The replacements spend at most a single unconfirmed input in my infinite relay cycle example. Murch