1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
|
Return-Path: <bright.dna@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B0EA86D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 22 Jul 2019 18:52:23 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pg1-f179.google.com (mail-pg1-f179.google.com
[209.85.215.179])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 331BA102
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 22 Jul 2019 18:52:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pg1-f179.google.com with SMTP id l21so18093699pgm.3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 22 Jul 2019 11:52:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=jbTeoS4EXPy9h9m1pwwCrliPLzf4r3jrmeZgcwCElp0=;
b=ctb4WN0JW/U82e/gWCQKuJgNLAcTRaLVVTmNgtxYXb0vvyh9pUQUKL3Z7Pjrmo+BAq
ZkZEC8cucf7O3FGKHJ+0IR2K8w04f9EgrSsulGDhGEQk+SrZHoCTYBCYP6HxDdnSyg/m
64DftYiMW/UgxtUTLjGFPl16AeIIgKjnCaMDEjLec+FJ0P6GFptDmiuFI9LZKL7QjpCl
pZJvVKLTfWAyxS8GzNNep7Nzdf/dJKo9iYfXxW8BzEDh40c6eSWMI/AcW/NFcVg4OTWF
z6gmn+rVJifu+bZLm1BZRgBG4/RvFuvQLwhckCApr7Ak+XYPakitdT4zgQHldkHC9u8k
0EVw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU+qj6QQbD6n0thE6TGZecKi8jlwRsvJNXXBFQd4HsRj4LfoRng
GwrFAMHcFqX/OEoiZvwDtCnpzf/S6TvScum4Tx5cig==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzd0tCHJuOtc5AdUnWnnMNFe1IGLeoARxbZ+y7kd1gXRV0S1hufvCEZ+sBTqLznBhROOpov4ePefhfo6YxY4EY=
X-Received: by 2002:a63:ab08:: with SMTP id p8mr75004289pgf.340.1563821541485;
Mon, 22 Jul 2019 11:52:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Peter <dizzle@pointbiz.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 14:52:10 -0400
Message-ID: <CADsWqbvFFg=GpO3FRpMhJP+2YtF9Qf3Gj+MSJcy=6QRSC6AqAg@mail.gmail.com>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000078ef67058e4993d3"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 20:38:56 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core to disable Bloom-based Filtering by
default
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 18:52:23 -0000
--00000000000078ef67058e4993d3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Hi,
I believe two wallets. Andreas' Android Bitcoin wallet and BRD are
significant users of node_bloom.
Privacy is a matter of individual choice in the current protocol. Why not
let people provide this network service? I don't see why it should be
end-of-life if it provides value.
I believe there's a network security obtained by having a large quantity of
people following the Bitcoin headers based on longest weighted chain. As a
means of nullifying potential miner initiated hard forks (like S2X).
Respectfully,
Peter
--00000000000078ef67058e4993d3
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"auto">Hi,<div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">I believ=
e two wallets. Andreas' Android Bitcoin wallet and BRD are significant =
users of node_bloom.</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Pri=
vacy is a matter of individual choice in the current protocol. Why not let =
people provide this network service? I don't see why it should be end-o=
f-life if it provides value.</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"a=
uto">I believe there's a network security obtained by having a large qu=
antity of people following the Bitcoin headers based on longest weighted ch=
ain. As a means of nullifying potential miner initiated hard forks (like S2=
X).</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Respectfully,</div><=
div dir=3D"auto">Peter=C2=A0</div></div>
--00000000000078ef67058e4993d3--
|
