Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B0EA86D for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 18:52:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-pg1-f179.google.com (mail-pg1-f179.google.com [209.85.215.179]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 331BA102 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 18:52:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pg1-f179.google.com with SMTP id l21so18093699pgm.3 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 11:52:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=jbTeoS4EXPy9h9m1pwwCrliPLzf4r3jrmeZgcwCElp0=; b=ctb4WN0JW/U82e/gWCQKuJgNLAcTRaLVVTmNgtxYXb0vvyh9pUQUKL3Z7Pjrmo+BAq ZkZEC8cucf7O3FGKHJ+0IR2K8w04f9EgrSsulGDhGEQk+SrZHoCTYBCYP6HxDdnSyg/m 64DftYiMW/UgxtUTLjGFPl16AeIIgKjnCaMDEjLec+FJ0P6GFptDmiuFI9LZKL7QjpCl pZJvVKLTfWAyxS8GzNNep7Nzdf/dJKo9iYfXxW8BzEDh40c6eSWMI/AcW/NFcVg4OTWF z6gmn+rVJifu+bZLm1BZRgBG4/RvFuvQLwhckCApr7Ak+XYPakitdT4zgQHldkHC9u8k 0EVw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU+qj6QQbD6n0thE6TGZecKi8jlwRsvJNXXBFQd4HsRj4LfoRng GwrFAMHcFqX/OEoiZvwDtCnpzf/S6TvScum4Tx5cig== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzd0tCHJuOtc5AdUnWnnMNFe1IGLeoARxbZ+y7kd1gXRV0S1hufvCEZ+sBTqLznBhROOpov4ePefhfo6YxY4EY= X-Received: by 2002:a63:ab08:: with SMTP id p8mr75004289pgf.340.1563821541485; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 11:52:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Peter Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 14:52:10 -0400 Message-ID: To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000078ef67058e4993d3" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 20:38:56 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core to disable Bloom-based Filtering by default X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 18:52:23 -0000 --00000000000078ef67058e4993d3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi, I believe two wallets. Andreas' Android Bitcoin wallet and BRD are significant users of node_bloom. Privacy is a matter of individual choice in the current protocol. Why not let people provide this network service? I don't see why it should be end-of-life if it provides value. I believe there's a network security obtained by having a large quantity of people following the Bitcoin headers based on longest weighted chain. As a means of nullifying potential miner initiated hard forks (like S2X). Respectfully, Peter --00000000000078ef67058e4993d3 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,

I believ= e two wallets. Andreas' Android Bitcoin wallet and BRD are significant = users of node_bloom.

Pri= vacy is a matter of individual choice in the current protocol. Why not let = people provide this network service? I don't see why it should be end-o= f-life if it provides value.

I believe there's a network security obtained by having a large qu= antity of people following the Bitcoin headers based on longest weighted ch= ain. As a means of nullifying potential miner initiated hard forks (like S2= X).

Respectfully,
<= div dir=3D"auto">Peter=C2=A0
--00000000000078ef67058e4993d3--