summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/3e/7e2e8e25288e341c723da378bf64dbeaf43596
blob: b05f7a4c7f22ad6ef00997059e86ed67d0025900 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <eugen@leitl.org>) id 1VS4P4-0005MI-2b
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Fri, 04 Oct 2013 12:22:42 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of leitl.org
	designates 164.177.174.8 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=164.177.174.8; envelope-from=eugen@leitl.org;
	helo=leitl.org; 
Received: from v8.ativel.com ([164.177.174.8] helo=leitl.org)
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1VS4P1-0007r7-U0
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Fri, 04 Oct 2013 12:22:42 +0000
Received: by leitl.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id C25EB543E97; Fri,  4 Oct 2013 14:22:32 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 14:22:32 +0200
From: Eugen Leitl <eugen@leitl.org>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID: <20131004122232.GL10405@leitl.org>
References: <CANEZrP1Sd8cK2YUr4OSvnOxEJrbWpmfdpor-qbap1f98tGqPwg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20131004115300.GA22215@savin>
	<CANEZrP3e4G_XJy4wDc6VeeBfPG3p4dJ4tpcB8PTwMCNn4+=9Yg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP3e4G_XJy4wDc6VeeBfPG3p4dJ4tpcB8PTwMCNn4+=9Yg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
X-Headers-End: 1VS4P1-0007r7-U0
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Code review
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 12:22:42 -0000

On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 02:14:19PM +0200, Mike Hearn wrote:

> One advantage of using github is that they're an independent third
> > party; we should think carefully about the risks of furthering the
> > impression that Bitcoin development is a closed process by moving the
> > code review it to a server that we control with explicit review groups.
> >
> 
> I guess anyone would be able to sign up and comment.

It's a long shot, but have any of you looked into Fossil?