Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of leitl.org
	designates 164.177.174.8 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=164.177.174.8; envelope-from=eugen@leitl.org;
	helo=leitl.org; 
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 14:22:32 +0200
From: Eugen Leitl <eugen@leitl.org>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID: <20131004122232.GL10405@leitl.org>
References: <CANEZrP1Sd8cK2YUr4OSvnOxEJrbWpmfdpor-qbap1f98tGqPwg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20131004115300.GA22215@savin>
	<CANEZrP3e4G_XJy4wDc6VeeBfPG3p4dJ4tpcB8PTwMCNn4+=9Yg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP3e4G_XJy4wDc6VeeBfPG3p4dJ4tpcB8PTwMCNn4+=9Yg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Code review
Precedence: list

On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 02:14:19PM +0200, Mike Hearn wrote:

> One advantage of using github is that they're an independent third
> > party; we should think carefully about the risks of furthering the
> > impression that Bitcoin development is a closed process by moving the
> > code review it to a server that we control with explicit review groups.
> >
> 
> I guess anyone would be able to sign up and comment.

It's a long shot, but have any of you looked into Fossil?