summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/2c/5418da1e01530604c27d35620f6771f0a490dc
blob: a070ecd9ae8c881905346ab6bed655636f5adf1b (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
Return-Path: <damian@willtech.com.au>
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138])
 by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF2BAC0011
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Thu, 24 Feb 2022 02:34:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBBD681D9F
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Thu, 24 Feb 2022 02:34:44 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.035
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.035 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665]
 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral
 reason="invalid (public key: not available)" header.d=willtech.com.au
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id NE7jhsmwnrKr
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Thu, 24 Feb 2022 02:34:42 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from burlywood.elm.relay.mailchannels.net
 (burlywood.elm.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.212.26])
 by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6F2381445
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Thu, 24 Feb 2022 02:34:42 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: hostpapa|x-authuser|damian@willtech.com.au
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 998234C11CD;
 Thu, 24 Feb 2022 02:34:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from s110.servername.online (unknown [127.0.0.6])
 (Authenticated sender: hostpapa)
 by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 21F7A4C10D0;
 Thu, 24 Feb 2022 02:34:41 +0000 (UTC)
ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-2022; d=mailchannels.net; t=1645670081; a=rsa-sha256;
 cv=none;
 b=dInfVSCVjxcIM04y2AxnF3ENU3DMyd+0HsepBrsJ6e5DhA40XW9lV/+9IWpOpJbGaVmGTl
 ttFKfPN47WfVRUdBXiYlFkqY5XKvHxf9FHuczxqUau+LaYOjy+Jqa/GCAXmDhJTiLqrRUk
 34VnneMJX5iIi5vMl0nngCdvSDbnuf8R5pcFWaKmDjltNVxZeGnCYoMyR1ehzdGFcoDvVA
 dl1Et0IEYZ+3sfzNo8ULBBaMOikNtYCIzGmwYctvZSREFsCs2LSDA+XDNiGb/xvB8LyqEA
 fPBGsRPQQBHplQ7bIL3FtqcvuZ4SO5uHsZiLQ510vaylTjfjN3KYGrP/3JK/+A==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=mailchannels.net; s=arc-2022; t=1645670081;
 h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature;
 bh=6cstRCvSiDiraynu0RxPeMFqPFk7LolZ+XVAd/bzI50=;
 b=11y3XaUEfSVURam6ovcA+NuU9aTXp9RLTRCXE3Ht3PpQc1XZpBRLTQ9Q1fBMPsg4diKhw3
 O4a58Bx9gp3EiQ2J1IhUfhtgOASZx9keBBKfk2utwLpQuNdyW8LnJQgfnAqylTU7GK77Za
 MGKkhTyUTFYfTjZlqDV+jK9Ma/vIuajdXuSdDBao8Sp6u60M04FB/zlakDWGbKpBCF8Tlo
 3t34SNXLXO3e81kbiuqjwmtj2ps9wKYfxeNnxy7tavBqYI2DEo2/nZP8PtAPktNdysqLM8
 5CW/IxP/+lCaPaFPXQvH3Su8I8ZvKL41zALTcwpGMfsgPg7orbM4kVVpTqRgdQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; rspamd-78dc4959d8-q9pdd;
 auth=pass smtp.auth=hostpapa smtp.mailfrom=damian@willtech.com.au
X-Sender-Id: hostpapa|x-authuser|damian@willtech.com.au
Received: from s110.servername.online (s110.servername.online [204.44.192.22])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384)
 by 100.107.255.153 (trex/6.5.3); Thu, 24 Feb 2022 02:34:41 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Junk
X-MailChannels-SenderId: hostpapa|x-authuser|damian@willtech.com.au
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: hostpapa
X-Harmony-Obese: 152d14310ca356a3_1645670081466_574193773
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1645670081466:2648861231
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1645670081466
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=willtech.com.au; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:
 Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:MIME-Version:Sender
 :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:
 Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:
 List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
 bh=6cstRCvSiDiraynu0RxPeMFqPFk7LolZ+XVAd/bzI50=; b=Oq29gPwR9jWBAFUD7w8rJ2898Z
 LA9WIPoQUHlxItzRLz9pcW8psAVvEn+QdOy5DWeJJ+PCi5cQtJBexdeg5QHgDjihHG5TjuDhEvwS9
 1YP2pPEr8+Sb+cfXKRFQmAEjbu82N1fuhdvKdmI+lEpydgoEGXmZCriG5IpaERy4bDXZOKvjDsQ/F
 66Glc2Bm12zurLk+5stdhFxAE5m9AIqN3LYKL/Yis7byfq+OiIUQ4zKIN6Ar27c89EJmeimYNPM4H
 5og2LLuxsZ1JO2//fo9ZrKwDCxTlV7J1vbDH7NBjKiUYJ5z38XuydQgRCJm5Z2+5MBR6BlN93xUVz
 lObL/EiA==;
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52410 helo=s110.servername.online)
 by s110.servername.online with esmtpa (Exim 4.94.2)
 (envelope-from <damian@willtech.com.au>)
 id 1nN3xo-009rlM-HS; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 18:34:40 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 13:34:39 +1100
From: damian@willtech.com.au
To: Casey Rodarmor <casey@rodarmor.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANLPe+Nc6ehatESSuS5jFXU-wammBSOe5GRjn45n8BAr90TPOg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANLPe+OZ33vcZheOyo2RdrvWzQvj3RzZc6sHTafGwbqEG2G4pA@mail.gmail.com>
 <0642a5e59464779569f9d0aab452ee27@willtech.com.au>
 <96471a093e3c3d9862c3d47ebe731df6@willtech.com.au>
 <CANLPe+Nc6ehatESSuS5jFXU-wammBSOe5GRjn45n8BAr90TPOg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.12
Message-ID: <a54b2632d9b20f9330cf129706f5c886@willtech.com.au>
X-Sender: damian@willtech.com.au
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-AuthUser: damian@willtech.com.au
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 08:15:13 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Draft-BIP: Ordinal Numbers
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 02:34:45 -0000

Not all people who have been stolen from believe that they have lost the 
right and title to what has been stolen and in many cases they have not. 
I do not excuse Bitcoin that it is impossible to have any individual 
Bitcoin identified but also I do not care, if I receive Bitcoin honestly 
I do not care what their history was. What if they were taken from a 
brothel? It is not a matter for an ordinal to determine if a satoshi is 
fungible. It is truth in effect that each satoshi is newly created to 
the new UTXO and the old satoshi destroyed. -DA.

  On 2022-02-23 18:31, Casey Rodarmor wrote:
>> ​The least reasonable thing I could expect is some claimed former
>> holder of some ordianls turning up to challenge me that it was their
>> stolen Bitcoin was some of what I received.
> 
> I think it's unlikely that this would come to pass. A previous owner
> of an ordinal wouldn't have any particular reason to expect that they
> should own it after they transfer it. Similar to how noting a dollar
> bill's serial number doesn't give you a claim to it after you spend
> it. From the BIP:
> 
>> ​Since any ordinal can be sent to any address at any time,
>> ordinals that are transferred, even those with some public history,
>> should be considered to be fungible with other satoshis with no such
>> history. [1]
> 
> 
> 
> Links:
> ------
> [1] 
> https://github.com/casey/ord/blob/master/bip.mediawiki#backward-compatibility