1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
|
Return-Path: <thomas@thomaszander.se>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EDDA8A6
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 12 Aug 2015 09:25:49 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from pmx.vmail.no (pmx.vmail.no [193.75.16.11])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFED989
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 12 Aug 2015 09:25:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pmx.vmail.no (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (pmx.isp.as2116.net) with SMTP id 0A3E661F41
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:25:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp.bluecom.no (smtp.bluecom.no [193.75.75.28])
by pmx.vmail.no (pmx.isp.as2116.net) with ESMTP id C79BE5F165
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:25:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pluto.localnet (unknown [81.191.183.21])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.bluecom.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE19B1F550
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:25:47 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Zander <thomas@thomaszander.se>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:25:46 +0200
Message-ID: <5373079.hYzSY9N1NW@pluto>
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.1 (Linux/3.16.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.14.2; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <CABm2gDoEeeAt1NWCRc7Z6Dd6ft_fS82J=JbWBb-d=g5KYpJA6Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABsx9T16fH+56isq95m4+QWsKwP==tf75ep8ghnEcBoV4OtZJA@mail.gmail.com>
<3295391.2gkoFVhbEs@pluto>
<CABm2gDoEeeAt1NWCRc7Z6Dd6ft_fS82J=JbWBb-d=g5KYpJA6Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Fees and the block-finding process
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 09:25:49 -0000
On Wednesday 12. August 2015 11.00.29 Jorge Tim=F3n wrote:
> Don't fear this happening at 1 MB, fear this happening at any size. T=
his
> needs to be solved regardless of the block size.
I know, everyone knows.
There is a lot of work that needs to be done to be able to use bitcoind=
at an=20
forever growing backlog. And since I've been doing software for some de=
cades,=20
I can tell you this won't be done or fixed in 6-12 months.
We probably haven't found the majority of the issues yet.
We need more time and a bigger blocksize gives us more time.
--=20
Thomas Zander
|
