From: Thomas Zander <thomas@thomaszander.se>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:25:46 +0200
Message-ID: <5373079.hYzSY9N1NW@pluto>
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.1 (Linux/3.16.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.14.2; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <CABm2gDoEeeAt1NWCRc7Z6Dd6ft_fS82J=JbWBb-d=g5KYpJA6Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABsx9T16fH+56isq95m4+QWsKwP==tf75ep8ghnEcBoV4OtZJA@mail.gmail.com>
	<3295391.2gkoFVhbEs@pluto>
	<CABm2gDoEeeAt1NWCRc7Z6Dd6ft_fS82J=JbWBb-d=g5KYpJA6Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Fees and the block-finding process
Precedence: list

On Wednesday 12. August 2015 11.00.29 Jorge Tim=F3n wrote:
> Don't fear this happening at 1 MB, fear this happening at any size. T=
his
> needs to be solved regardless of the block size.

I know, everyone knows.

There is a lot of work that needs to be done to be able to use bitcoind=
 at an=20
forever growing backlog. And since I've been doing software for some de=
cades,=20
I can tell you this won't be done or fixed in 6-12 months.
We probably haven't found the majority of the issues yet.

We need more time and a bigger blocksize gives us more time.
--=20
Thomas Zander