summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/13/11120d8c47758fbd0f4d8cc4bf50f1dcdb630d
blob: 8444713c68fb034b60d9834cbb39ff0dfc6a3d2b (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <stick@gk2.sk>) id 1YIRGh-0004uO-FD
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 03 Feb 2015 00:23:03 +0000
X-ACL-Warn: 
Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com ([209.85.212.182])
	by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1YIRGf-0005wO-2t
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 03 Feb 2015 00:23:03 +0000
Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id n3so18454648wiv.3
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Mon, 02 Feb 2015 16:22:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=a9idgFT0l+t+L7fmCQOsGa1Z4NNElfr4FKTpiDh+WYw=;
	b=KiHyRUhg+kAbndKJLMVz9TrqwtHz1l7vp342AzcyTE27gqC1PkyyjfiHwO+qbRnaX+
	k69wd8ZU6kI44VTxzU2yyx8ADtPma10toJFeTAZzLzKjO2DiZ0P+LkqUGLMX4ro7dYbc
	upC4CIQxa3MUTkADHPy4WcfFo6TKyaGt/NVSuZdZgOeUPhUZPT7zMlF2X39bsH+9he0H
	7MMd0iV/yeH5A2Nz5fwWu4QgA1iclKWDhECUMpFS2t21w6zrWSQVUG5NWG8lyVDTO+fW
	opDwTXBug5z1i+xSGxZBkozUH548vg+IjSabh54/tScYs7vRm7aM1lF3Wgtzsc2o/3FF
	Gu0g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnDNJCZ8nUl3j9jeSsigDiqbTDZuf8DLPiHtwhPe+zcKe5uubjIAlkX0gwvMr0xOfgNddPu
X-Received: by 10.180.109.193 with SMTP id hu1mr29828648wib.25.1422922974780; 
	Mon, 02 Feb 2015 16:22:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tetra.site ([185.68.216.157])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id r3sm22049434wic.10.2015.02.02.16.22.52
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
	Mon, 02 Feb 2015 16:22:53 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54D014DB.50404@gk2.sk>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 01:22:51 +0100
From: Pavol Rusnak <stick@gk2.sk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andreas Schildbach <andreas@schildbach.de>, 
	bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
References: <CAG86ZOxYh+=rny3sPHeJ0qs6R=5frLXERKmwhVECGHo7tkrz3w@mail.gmail.com>	<CANEZrP3Tuw3mJLSuoOA4iOmg6u9sdh-E5NNm_FgdYs3Mx39znA@mail.gmail.com>	<manr4t$c1a$1@ger.gmane.org>	<54CF74A5.3050304@gk2.sk>	<mao0u5$gbu$1@ger.gmane.org>	<54CF9016.5070206@gk2.sk>
	<map3bi$pkf$2@ger.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <map3bi$pkf$2@ger.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
X-Headers-End: 1YIRGf-0005wO-2t
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Export format for xpub
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 00:23:03 -0000

On 03/02/15 01:05, Andreas Schildbach wrote:
> I don't think that parameterizing will work, we can't predict future
> BIPs. It's the same as for BIP43, in the end we agreed on just putting
> the BIP number.

Hm, let me put the questions the other way around:

What gap limit should a wallet use if it encounters h=bip32?

What h value should I use for myTREZOR wallets? Which is essentially a
BIP44 wallet that produces h=bip32 xpubs with gap limit 20 ...

-- 
Best Regards / S pozdravom,

Pavol Rusnak <stick@gk2.sk>