Message-ID: <54D014DB.50404@gk2.sk>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 01:22:51 +0100
From: Pavol Rusnak <stick@gk2.sk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andreas Schildbach <andreas@schildbach.de>, 
	bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
References: <CAG86ZOxYh+=rny3sPHeJ0qs6R=5frLXERKmwhVECGHo7tkrz3w@mail.gmail.com>	<CANEZrP3Tuw3mJLSuoOA4iOmg6u9sdh-E5NNm_FgdYs3Mx39znA@mail.gmail.com>	<manr4t$c1a$1@ger.gmane.org>	<54CF74A5.3050304@gk2.sk>	<mao0u5$gbu$1@ger.gmane.org>	<54CF9016.5070206@gk2.sk>
	<map3bi$pkf$2@ger.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <map3bi$pkf$2@ger.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Export format for xpub
Precedence: list

On 03/02/15 01:05, Andreas Schildbach wrote:
> I don't think that parameterizing will work, we can't predict future
> BIPs. It's the same as for BIP43, in the end we agreed on just putting
> the BIP number.

Hm, let me put the questions the other way around:

What gap limit should a wallet use if it encounters h=bip32?

What h value should I use for myTREZOR wallets? Which is essentially a
BIP44 wallet that produces h=bip32 xpubs with gap limit 20 ...

-- 
Best Regards / S pozdravom,

Pavol Rusnak <stick@gk2.sk>