1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
|
Return-Path: <earonesty@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2B8FC002D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 7 Nov 2022 14:48:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B58834042F
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 7 Nov 2022 14:48:02 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org B58834042F
Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org;
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=q32-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com
header.i=@q32-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.a=rsa-sha256
header.s=20210112 header.b=us9yu823
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id iZlpwdif2WOI
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 7 Nov 2022 14:48:01 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org A1EFE4035A
Received: from mail-vk1-xa2a.google.com (mail-vk1-xa2a.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a2a])
by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1EFE4035A
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 7 Nov 2022 14:48:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vk1-xa2a.google.com with SMTP id i15so6830922vka.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 07 Nov 2022 06:48:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=q32-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112;
h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=pOMzQYkFNjUGyIL0yRzFBSWKg9sT9xSL5VcS9bLupvo=;
b=us9yu823tlSWFCoBvnpnjH6E33ZUPZDmBMKuxK5cHJV3oeY22JSTdyBFl4Ds1w7z+2
3y8/RWBiXDMxAo2smLYABbLqHFaAqA6Z0BpSudRA9bOlu3sXP2FeDP1pYvvqzFBtevy3
WpKEzzOxMHm0sncacUiz5R9uiwkjITx0DtxCHA+lZ2EnQC42MSq+Yr+bVrlcCwzirVdS
OCpIYQ654dGf0BZXRaWLV4tSDF4DTBxRoGaIOrXVIRy5VpeARr6J2IoxKI4Tudemma1V
hvtFJmZIhU7tCQCUZtDCnGJW+qN0yhH83bnH5ze5qQXVv4rNSGkW0VcBFgYDdHPoVrw9
g2SQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
:reply-to;
bh=pOMzQYkFNjUGyIL0yRzFBSWKg9sT9xSL5VcS9bLupvo=;
b=PdZDtzIxF5DouGcx5HQYN+IhLukmXnVU3B0wmw8gvrBDrM7ej+giSWO335nDrp1WRk
w+Ljzzm4x5tO98y9DpgqIA+dXC8D3PIBFl6Ve8PXnH/rcpKEUSX7lZI/3ePL1KG2VkF1
yKH7c9uSZWx9/QInMfsBtRc9ulcpA4irfNYoiWQGESxvU59TKa0wdnwYQ0fDnt0M0r5U
U5gKDmu6zjl/45NpRP4S8a8kvsgu8b8P65YnXrLT5RGswkoVtvAfdXYfftoP1eebqKAk
Q9n7yzs+DZaeDQlXkzjfwpcrIQUCwbK5i27XjUv5UV5hpKaCYIbEKMA11B6lF+cgI0zE
T6dQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf3FCjEMdic6NObvrgSt3Oqot9pOU5abIbP0en2i/SOYfl8zHN9N
IGmeErMwNI54Bt/p0Y5yR8HfDAZDcnGyj5xEFj6gksCdfp6l
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5Ek1WBWr5gjhJhg++Km0Rb/gloKFfGXX3REwu7R7NcMJF2iIGAtmpofb7pgLWwwUJEFWNMUN7eJZQo6l643iw=
X-Received: by 2002:a1f:e1c2:0:b0:3b8:ae7a:7588 with SMTP id
y185-20020a1fe1c2000000b003b8ae7a7588mr6828611vkg.16.1667832480375; Mon, 07
Nov 2022 06:48:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <16eb6a50691ccc661310051de6b8e2c0@yancy.lol>
<0A6B5781-EBC6-4D98-8AE8-43436B5F73EA@petertodd.org>
In-Reply-To: <0A6B5781-EBC6-4D98-8AE8-43436B5F73EA@petertodd.org>
From: Erik Aronesty <erik@q32.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 09:47:50 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJowKgLWGL15kjVS4eFB2je1s+2feQZ6Qo8GFAyVHF_Pfjkf2A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000089aae605ece2826c"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 07 Nov 2022 14:59:01 +0000
Cc: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] On mempool policy consistency
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2022 14:48:03 -0000
--00000000000089aae605ece2826c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
>
> With full-rbf, who saw what transaction first doesn't matter: the higher
> fee paying transaction will always(*) replace the lower fee one. With
> opt-in RBF, spamming the network can beat out the alternative.
>
incentivised predictability is critical when designing low level protocols,
like bitcoin. the knock-on effects of deeper, network-wide predictability
are likely beneficial in ways that are hard to predict. for example stuff
like the "sabu" protocol might even work if full-rbf is the norm.
--00000000000089aae605ece2826c
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quot=
e" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204)=
;padding-left:1ex"><br>With full-rbf, who saw what transaction first doesn&=
#39;t matter: the higher fee paying transaction will always(*) replace the =
lower fee one. With opt-in RBF, spamming the network can beat out the alter=
native.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>incentivised predictability is =
critical when designing low level protocols, like bitcoin.=C2=A0 =C2=A0the =
knock-on effects of deeper, network-wide predictability are likely benefici=
al in ways that are hard to predict.=C2=A0 =C2=A0for example stuff like the=
"sabu" protocol=C2=A0might even work if full-rbf is the norm.</d=
iv><div>=C2=A0</div><div>=C2=A0</div></div></div>
--00000000000089aae605ece2826c--
|
