1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
|
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE7179FB
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 26 Jun 2015 19:30:47 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from outmail149077.authsmtp.com (outmail149077.authsmtp.com
[62.13.149.77])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12D4911E
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 26 Jun 2015 19:30:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c235.authsmtp.com (mail-c235.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.235])
by punt15.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t5QJUbaL070756;
Fri, 26 Jun 2015 20:30:37 +0100 (BST)
Received: from muck (static-71-247-144-172.nycmny.east.verizon.net
[71.247.144.172]) (authenticated bits=128)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t5QJUVEf015564
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
Fri, 26 Jun 2015 20:30:35 +0100 (BST)
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 15:30:31 -0400
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Pindar Wong <pindar.wong@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20150626193031.GA17829@muck>
References: <CALqxMTGBt7MNs5YWf8QzKe+4Fr-uKVimf8=VbytBANEDm=s50g@mail.gmail.com>
<CANEZrP31AEson9DZ=ZU7d4t=DvmGodh1ja6EaZ6xQZ3bFEXeVA@mail.gmail.com>
<CALqxMTFC7zBN9GvHAZLQj4SbXjzkCAM9meSErd3qn7uCoON98Q@mail.gmail.com>
<CAM7BtUoNJ3vPqW9esCBo8XSN=yRjC3oheP_hd_kcgzs0_0De6w@mail.gmail.com>
<20150616133305.GA30988@muck>
<CAM7BtUr1zmw_Jmyn8ULZ=Jb-pkAwUwvBK68UWmzeJH3kAmYEhA@mail.gmail.com>
<20150617035959.GB23826@muck>
<CAM7BtUqCZSGfgF7Xq4g7ZCrB-nrsur8B78myDd+NBsqZ0S_rZw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAM7BtUqCZSGfgF7Xq4g7ZCrB-nrsur8B78myDd+NBsqZ0S_rZw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Server-Quench: d24b44f5-1c39-11e5-b396-002590a15da7
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
bAdMdAQUEkAaAgsB AmMbWVReU117WmQ7 bAtPbwFafEtKWxtr
V0pWR1pVCwQmRRlg fHt4J09ydgBDfno+ Z0BkWXAVCEZ+J0J5
FEtJFD4FbHphaTUa TRJbfgVJcANIexZF O1F6ACIKLwdSbGoL
NQ4vNDcwO3BTJTpY RgYVKF8UXXNDByMx XAwDGjM0VUQPQDgv
ZxYnNlUbHUBUAnl6 OlwtVBoWNAURQkM8 V0dKBmpSIF8aSiww
EBgSXUcEHHhTRj1f agAA
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1023:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 71.247.144.172/587
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Constance Choi <constance.choi@gmail.com>,
Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Primavera De Filippi <pdefilippi@gmail.com>,
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT
code fork & non-consensus hard-fork
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 19:30:47 -0000
--qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 02:43:19PM +0800, Pindar Wong wrote:
> > Yup, though keep in mind the regulatory question is more than just how
> > your local jurisdiction views Bitcoin, but rather how your customers'
> > jurisdictions view Bitcoin.
> >
> > Of course, when I say "customers" above, I mean the entire Bitcoin
> > community that is ultimately buying the new coins produced by miners and
> > paying fees to them!
> >
>=20
> I'm sorry for the distraction with the mailing list problems.
>=20
> Taking an ecosystem view, the miners are important, so are all the other
> participants who rely on it and invest time, effort and energy to make
> Bitcoin work and work well.
Agreed.
IMO any change to the blocksize needs explicit mechanisms to let all
Bitcoin holders have a say in it.
> I am in contact with Primavera and it would appear that the Cyberport is
> available for use on October 14 and 15 (Wed/Thursday).
Great! Glad to hear.
> Last November, this was where the Global Bitcoin Summit (Hong Kong)
> <http://www.cyberport.hk/en/about_cyberport/our_5_centres/collaboration_c=
entre/collaboration_news/2146>
> was hosted with the participation of many of China's leading
> Bitcoin-related companies. There is a meeting now in Shanghai.
>=20
> It would be an honour to host a more technical meeting to discuss BIP100,
> 101 et al. should be interest to do so.
Are you thinking this more technical meeting should be before or after
the October event? Perhaps a better question, is what exactly do you see
being discussed at a technical meeting?
--=20
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
0000000000000000007fc13ce02072d9cb2a6d51fae41fefcde7b3b283803d24
--qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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==
=KnbM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk--
|
