Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 15:30:31 -0400
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Pindar Wong <pindar.wong@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20150626193031.GA17829@muck>
References: <CALqxMTGBt7MNs5YWf8QzKe+4Fr-uKVimf8=VbytBANEDm=s50g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP31AEson9DZ=ZU7d4t=DvmGodh1ja6EaZ6xQZ3bFEXeVA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALqxMTFC7zBN9GvHAZLQj4SbXjzkCAM9meSErd3qn7uCoON98Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAM7BtUoNJ3vPqW9esCBo8XSN=yRjC3oheP_hd_kcgzs0_0De6w@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150616133305.GA30988@muck>
	<CAM7BtUr1zmw_Jmyn8ULZ=Jb-pkAwUwvBK68UWmzeJH3kAmYEhA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150617035959.GB23826@muck>
	<CAM7BtUqCZSGfgF7Xq4g7ZCrB-nrsur8B78myDd+NBsqZ0S_rZw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAM7BtUqCZSGfgF7Xq4g7ZCrB-nrsur8B78myDd+NBsqZ0S_rZw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Constance Choi <constance.choi@gmail.com>,
	Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	Primavera De Filippi <pdefilippi@gmail.com>,
	bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT
 code fork & non-consensus hard-fork
Precedence: list


--qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 02:43:19PM +0800, Pindar Wong wrote:
> > Yup, though keep in mind the regulatory question is more than just how
> > your local jurisdiction views Bitcoin, but rather how your customers'
> > jurisdictions view Bitcoin.
> >
> > Of course, when I say "customers" above, I mean the entire Bitcoin
> > community that is ultimately buying the new coins produced by miners and
> > paying fees to them!
> >
>=20
> I'm sorry for the distraction with the mailing list problems.
>=20
> Taking an ecosystem view, the miners are important, so are all the other
> participants who rely on it and  invest time, effort and energy to make
> Bitcoin work and work well.

Agreed.

IMO any change to the blocksize needs explicit mechanisms to let all
Bitcoin holders have a say in it.

> I am in contact with Primavera and it would appear that the Cyberport is
> available for use on October 14 and 15 (Wed/Thursday).

Great! Glad to hear.

> Last November, this was where the Global Bitcoin Summit (Hong Kong)
> <http://www.cyberport.hk/en/about_cyberport/our_5_centres/collaboration_c=
entre/collaboration_news/2146>
> was hosted with the participation of many of China's leading
> Bitcoin-related companies. There is a meeting now in Shanghai.
>=20
> It would be an honour to host a more technical meeting to discuss BIP100,
> 101 et al. should be interest to do so.

Are you thinking this more technical meeting should be before or after
the October event? Perhaps a better question, is what exactly do you see
being discussed at a technical meeting?

--=20
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
0000000000000000007fc13ce02072d9cb2a6d51fae41fefcde7b3b283803d24

--qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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==
=KnbM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk--