1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
|
Return-Path: <patrick.strateman@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A565774
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:59:22 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pa0-f45.google.com (mail-pa0-f45.google.com
[209.85.220.45])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DDDCE8
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:59:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pacgr6 with SMTP id gr6so105461568pac.2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 17 Aug 2015 02:59:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:user-agent
:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type;
bh=RZtsQOb4adRXGNxeTbWqcP64qm8ZmhrsHSQHsFkE8fw=;
b=iefST+8uVeowIfF6EURVG9m8ZvLzglvgZ7FMqJFXOrLELNJpsCOMBZGjDzzzO060LG
OUfsGgRh44uf7It08trtb3DaELwXM8S3hi05D+gAx+1nULn1WzsSuTTgojGCPll7Ict0
gKIsbVtg9nw+Ns/L6WGD6w8XrgZBNYtlB7IzOMdtM43E3QY/f37z7XJyjoVpHWRaaLnu
+61PwwtWlEyVbFz3hz4EiY5PWQPhp8Dg9ugsPQyUGCKXK0yJvmA6OQcrTlAFqR9XRs6s
Y0IKLJzkSRc4/jNFRyp9mM7y3gDdqEGZJWkkOioAHeqLF/inZQnLQwdQhm09GffNI33U
009w==
X-Received: by 10.66.253.229 with SMTP id ad5mr1085278pad.101.1439805561177;
Mon, 17 Aug 2015 02:59:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.45.134.112] (c-67-188-9-126.hsd1.ca.comcast.net.
[67.188.9.126]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id
pf10sm14164862pac.43.2015.08.17.02.59.20
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Mon, 17 Aug 2015 02:59:20 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <55D1B077.6070208@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 02:59:19 -0700
From: Patrick Strateman <patrick.strateman@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
References: <CAED3CWjfWAC-6=5P8OWx-1eP6Dq52K=c1L5B7h6fjGb71e-STw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAED3CWjfWAC-6=5P8OWx-1eP6Dq52K=c1L5B7h6fjGb71e-STw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------030605060509050902020905"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Dynamically Controlled Bitcoin Block Size Max Cap
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:59:22 -0000
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------030605060509050902020905
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Nobody is going to click that...
On 08/17/2015 02:44 AM, Upal Chakraborty via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> I have tried to solve the maximum block size debate, depending on the
> previous block size calculation.
>
> Requesting for comment - http://upalc.com/maxblocksize.php
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
--------------030605060509050902020905
Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Nobody is going to click that...<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 08/17/2015 02:44 AM, Upal
Chakraborty via bitcoin-dev wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAED3CWjfWAC-6=5P8OWx-1eP6Dq52K=c1L5B7h6fjGb71e-STw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr"><span style="font-size:12.8000001907349px">I have
tried to solve the maximum block size debate, depending on the
previous block size calculation.</span><br
style="font-size:12.8000001907349px">
<br style="font-size:12.8000001907349px">
<span style="font-size:12.8000001907349px">Requesting for
comment - </span><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://upalc.com/maxblocksize.php" target="_blank"
style="font-size:12.8000001907349px">http://upalc.com/maxblocksize.php</a><br>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------030605060509050902020905--
|
