Return-Path: <patrick.strateman@gmail.com> Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A565774 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:59:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-pa0-f45.google.com (mail-pa0-f45.google.com [209.85.220.45]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DDDCE8 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:59:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pacgr6 with SMTP id gr6so105461568pac.2 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 02:59:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=RZtsQOb4adRXGNxeTbWqcP64qm8ZmhrsHSQHsFkE8fw=; b=iefST+8uVeowIfF6EURVG9m8ZvLzglvgZ7FMqJFXOrLELNJpsCOMBZGjDzzzO060LG OUfsGgRh44uf7It08trtb3DaELwXM8S3hi05D+gAx+1nULn1WzsSuTTgojGCPll7Ict0 gKIsbVtg9nw+Ns/L6WGD6w8XrgZBNYtlB7IzOMdtM43E3QY/f37z7XJyjoVpHWRaaLnu +61PwwtWlEyVbFz3hz4EiY5PWQPhp8Dg9ugsPQyUGCKXK0yJvmA6OQcrTlAFqR9XRs6s Y0IKLJzkSRc4/jNFRyp9mM7y3gDdqEGZJWkkOioAHeqLF/inZQnLQwdQhm09GffNI33U 009w== X-Received: by 10.66.253.229 with SMTP id ad5mr1085278pad.101.1439805561177; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 02:59:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.45.134.112] (c-67-188-9-126.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [67.188.9.126]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id pf10sm14164862pac.43.2015.08.17.02.59.20 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 17 Aug 2015 02:59:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <55D1B077.6070208@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 02:59:19 -0700 From: Patrick Strateman <patrick.strateman@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org References: <CAED3CWjfWAC-6=5P8OWx-1eP6Dq52K=c1L5B7h6fjGb71e-STw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAED3CWjfWAC-6=5P8OWx-1eP6Dq52K=c1L5B7h6fjGb71e-STw@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030605060509050902020905" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Dynamically Controlled Bitcoin Block Size Max Cap X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:59:22 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030605060509050902020905 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Nobody is going to click that... On 08/17/2015 02:44 AM, Upal Chakraborty via bitcoin-dev wrote: > I have tried to solve the maximum block size debate, depending on the > previous block size calculation. > > Requesting for comment - http://upalc.com/maxblocksize.php > > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev --------------030605060509050902020905 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit <html> <head> <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> Nobody is going to click that...<br> <br> <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 08/17/2015 02:44 AM, Upal Chakraborty via bitcoin-dev wrote:<br> </div> <blockquote cite="mid:CAED3CWjfWAC-6=5P8OWx-1eP6Dq52K=c1L5B7h6fjGb71e-STw@mail.gmail.com" type="cite"> <div dir="ltr"><span style="font-size:12.8000001907349px">I have tried to solve the maximum block size debate, depending on the previous block size calculation.</span><br style="font-size:12.8000001907349px"> <br style="font-size:12.8000001907349px"> <span style="font-size:12.8000001907349px">Requesting for comment -�</span><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://upalc.com/maxblocksize.php" target="_blank" style="font-size:12.8000001907349px">http://upalc.com/maxblocksize.php</a><br> </div> <br> <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset> <br> <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a> </pre> </blockquote> <br> </body> </html> --------------030605060509050902020905--