diff options
author | Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> | 2017-09-29 09:52:03 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2017-09-29 13:52:10 +0000 |
commit | 9c0673eac68558d351e521600b2e4772da30d486 (patch) | |
tree | 605c35f9bc3754f1173e253e639c2d1134827c20 | |
parent | c5015887608e115a04fef00ab2f0ddc88b75c3fa (diff) | |
download | pi-bitcoindev-9c0673eac68558d351e521600b2e4772da30d486.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-9c0673eac68558d351e521600b2e4772da30d486.zip |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Address expiration times should be added to BIP-173
-rw-r--r-- | b8/712234f4ce0498a6f8452dd30c7c470cd45a33 | 153 |
1 files changed, 153 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/b8/712234f4ce0498a6f8452dd30c7c470cd45a33 b/b8/712234f4ce0498a6f8452dd30c7c470cd45a33 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b8444d541 --- /dev/null +++ b/b8/712234f4ce0498a6f8452dd30c7c470cd45a33 @@ -0,0 +1,153 @@ +Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org> +Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org + [172.17.192.35]) + by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BF86955 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Fri, 29 Sep 2017 13:52:10 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 +Received: from outmail149082.authsmtp.co.uk (outmail149082.authsmtp.co.uk + [62.13.149.82]) + by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B025E17E + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Fri, 29 Sep 2017 13:52:09 +0000 (UTC) +Received: from mail-c247.authsmtp.com (mail-c247.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.247]) + by punt20.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id v8TDq78L098124; + Fri, 29 Sep 2017 14:52:07 +0100 (BST) +Received: from petertodd.org (ec2-52-5-185-120.compute-1.amazonaws.com + [52.5.185.120]) (authenticated bits=0) + by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id v8TDq5co089848 + (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); + Fri, 29 Sep 2017 14:52:06 +0100 (BST) +Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by petertodd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D3BBB40018; + Fri, 29 Sep 2017 13:52:04 +0000 (UTC) +Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000) + id C68E5205E4; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 09:52:03 -0400 (EDT) +Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 09:52:03 -0400 +From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> +To: Andreas Schildbach <andreas@schildbach.de>, + Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +Message-ID: <20170929135203.GA16240@savin.petertodd.org> +References: <20170927160654.GA12492@savin.petertodd.org> + <oqihpf$5gc$1@blaine.gmane.org> + <20170929014543.GB11956@savin.petertodd.org> + <oql14j$4qq$1@blaine.gmane.org> + <20170929095537.GA15286@savin.petertodd.org> + <oqlf95$8kq$1@blaine.gmane.org> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; + protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="azLHFNyN32YCQGCU" +Content-Disposition: inline +In-Reply-To: <oqlf95$8kq$1@blaine.gmane.org> +User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) +X-Server-Quench: 618494a2-a51d-11e7-a0cc-0015176ca198 +X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: + http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse +X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR + aAdMdAsUC1AEAgsB AmEbWlBeVV97WWU7 bghPaBtcak9QXgdq + T0pMXVMcUg0MdV0E VUEeWhB6cw0If395 ZQhkX3hfVUArd1ss + R08ACGwHMGB9OWBM A11YdwJRcQRMLU5E Y1gxNiYHcQ5VPz4z + GA41ejw8IwAXAShZ WAwWNhofUV4KBDcg RhcEVSkuGEAeDz4z + KAEiJhYWEQ4YPkk/ PRM9XhoyEidXU1IF dwAA +X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1038:706 +X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) +X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 52.5.185.120/25 +X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own + anti-virus system. +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW + autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on + smtp1.linux-foundation.org +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Address expiration times should be added to + BIP-173 +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 13:52:10 -0000 + + +--azLHFNyN32YCQGCU +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii +Content-Disposition: inline +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 02:45:32PM +0200, Andreas Schildbach via bitcoin-de= +v wrote: +> On 09/29/2017 11:55 AM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote: +>=20 +> >>> I'm well aware. As the payment protocol hasn't caught on - and doesn'= +t fully +> >>> overlap all the usecases that addresses do anyway - I think we should= + consider +> >>> bringing this important feature to Bitcoin addresses too. +> >> +> >> Hasn't caught on? It is used for virtually all merchant transactions, +> >> plus person to person transactions between Bitcoin Wallet users. +> >=20 +> > "Virtually all"? +> >=20 +> > I regularly pay with Bitcoin, and I haven't seen the payment protocol u= +sed in +> > ages. +>=20 +> I regularly pay with Bitcoin, and I haven't seen the payment protocol +> not being in use in ages. +>=20 +> > Can you name some users of it? +>=20 +> 15+ Mio Coinbase users + +Lol, interesting mistake I made w/ Coinbase: my mobile wallets are all setu= +p in +ways that don't support the payment protocol w/ Coinbase, probably because = +come +to think of it they were (still are?) rejecting payment protocol requests o= +ver +proxies and Tor. And on my desktop setups payment protocol URLs don't work = +for +various reasons, and I'd forgotten I'd manually disabled them ages ago. + +Just checked and Bitfinex, BTCC, and Shapeshift all don't seem to use the +payment protocol. + +Other than BitPay and Coinbase, do you have an example of a service support= +ing +the payment protocol? + +> ~10 Mio BitPay users +> 8 Mio Bitcoin Wallet users +> Plus Bitcoin Core, Electrum, etc (sorry no numbers) +>=20 +> Probably the only usecase for naked addresses is paper wallets, right? +> I'm not sure if paper wallets can expire. + +User-to-user payments pretty much always use naked addresses. + +--=20 +https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org + +--azLHFNyN32YCQGCU +Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" +Content-Description: Digital signature + +-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- + +iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJZzk//AAoJECSBQD2l8JH7rmgH/j18CiwAAswJNTHgz7mr6E/G +5e+uaRnvAqnfNVUoLfs3vll1lOMkh3FXfuVwYJLffnNYToHdJpl+oZTRVDhF9C0T +P1vUxEe1XHjwETgwFi3M1ltjXP9EWilAi+hzMKeLELOg7ZxW3mNGlMlqkPSdJHag +fCJtMrt2M8v3++BpCY3piDShQf+wqM6vPxZbeFGrzSYK2EQ8JHVExVSxikcBvtq/ +6hDhKqhE3YOPpPGgnaswNp2ki6mZuNvBaJ7M4cGOA4MDH7kT8QNaKAnISbJLAlyE +KPefAJ3GuDm9CqYN7B3k9AtIovQZQuK/HaS87crUTyskL7fDwo157Rr8MxABH8Y= +=p8IC +-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- + +--azLHFNyN32YCQGCU-- + |