diff options
author | Alex Morcos <morcos@gmail.com> | 2017-09-29 12:50:20 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2017-09-29 12:50:32 +0000 |
commit | c5015887608e115a04fef00ab2f0ddc88b75c3fa (patch) | |
tree | 9ca0ef7936941f8925422e671165d42872de396b | |
parent | 2d6252b9cf4870546f8ecf8303cefcd1a3d67805 (diff) | |
download | pi-bitcoindev-c5015887608e115a04fef00ab2f0ddc88b75c3fa.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-c5015887608e115a04fef00ab2f0ddc88b75c3fa.zip |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Rebatable fees & incentive-safe fee markets
-rw-r--r-- | 81/a8cfe30d2a0a70f8903ec1d72b3bb153afbd55 | 140 |
1 files changed, 140 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/81/a8cfe30d2a0a70f8903ec1d72b3bb153afbd55 b/81/a8cfe30d2a0a70f8903ec1d72b3bb153afbd55 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..4a9779169 --- /dev/null +++ b/81/a8cfe30d2a0a70f8903ec1d72b3bb153afbd55 @@ -0,0 +1,140 @@ +Return-Path: <morcos@gmail.com> +Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org + [172.17.192.35]) + by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E82A340A + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Fri, 29 Sep 2017 12:50:32 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 +Received: from mail-it0-f41.google.com (mail-it0-f41.google.com + [209.85.214.41]) + by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73836433 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Fri, 29 Sep 2017 12:50:31 +0000 (UTC) +Received: by mail-it0-f41.google.com with SMTP id e134so1929144ite.3 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Fri, 29 Sep 2017 05:50:31 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; + h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; + bh=r+mBWK7utey7l0pMwjk157lZbsu2qHGdPJ90GDPvX+Y=; + b=LuhLP4vxFhcg9WqeNua6UXB6czyL3KZBsvsXnlxIHfrDTsHBX73Jc4KPCEvvUzQdbe + B9wtTVDpcDCeArariGK61/BVYdTi+uiJwIbIYEAQHar9nBkGT4LIQiWCoweyC26cDi/N + KajGpneJDaqzR/oOmSEv8DnPRIDZRGWmSP1q0BzV7+5FhdiC/iKCK5vEdzXej7A2k+lp + HdVuFZUCI05r/5Tiwc/kmx1JEZ2Q0EKue9BKfwJfciFFjA5BVRa4UQa4a3OyA62ZzNsq + ygbRV5n0I3h/uwbxoVi1fx5SXmfNgTe+2V2LyZtUdA+WLKZ2XESrz0xjs8g4T57N6IT/ + r3tg== +X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; + d=1e100.net; s=20161025; + h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date + :message-id:subject:to; + bh=r+mBWK7utey7l0pMwjk157lZbsu2qHGdPJ90GDPvX+Y=; + b=WZEB1P1DT1sq31vQnOxPXLUSxLyqFqAJIq5YpnQuaNyhLeljBfrXxcXdFo7n6kf8MD + l50gzSQ1txYTtvgYbzYwwubYO/p0ZQcvBG6AQMr5JAP41q5Q2x+BKrggsu1r/Oj/LjN7 + RcVuFEO1nI53alR7bSgIdGtUVxnA/bMqIcI3ErPklxfDXzFcpqSNtfTbT+/7aN0ZZOoi + 90lv1WW/ORy5QDaDbTIRLS5Gk/xklx0epK1+Ebg2JjEPEyTcgpCte0SJyw6psRimcvqx + G8NzVk79T1YML41dyvYs2R8N38tu+Xva8SrMmh+Gcxow196u5bXhL/rbZF1/TXkxMN3Y + 1QTw== +X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaWu/zO86c4n0f3yMosuoac5A2V4GbMMSYD66zWerWv+YV0yLh0T + pcXXc2csdNcNjp+yKe++SXjuuwicACYNGBHpmPdF5A== +X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QDv0Nc+1y8KDsXU0qLIsJ8/TU4cbGv6ZgluXpg0qsXFUzGiwRJMcwxKKdRZ0/lDomii3UQfV6Ln1lXrgXV9Md0= +X-Received: by 10.36.84.82 with SMTP id t79mr6837078ita.98.1506689430759; Fri, + 29 Sep 2017 05:50:30 -0700 (PDT) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +References: <CAEgR2PGCZ=F85yjAbZgC6NtzhpdgBL3n4M2jowN12wJ7x-Ai1A@mail.gmail.com> + <CAEgR2PGrxDQE0k8WX4XXz9GN-RAL6JB51ST9Hdz=ba36gRCa6A@mail.gmail.com> + <CAEgR2PFjt=ihzRBhNXbHTAJz1R+3vz8o-zRZkDA3iBo39x9cTQ@mail.gmail.com> + <CAEgR2PFfSjJjkTYq+DAmTzmkHPxqhn6fUDoXTzrRebz+OoUgqw@mail.gmail.com> + <CAEgR2PG5ZueHKDXbsPDEjQG7xAYBa_JAtPZo9n1V2=STC1srpA@mail.gmail.com> + <CAEgR2PGPQ1e9SmoWOS3V+N9v+OWiM4g3nPN3d9urc+DfkWEJ7A@mail.gmail.com> + <CAEgR2PEKkHH6+Sh8cQGF83-s1tpwQZgd0fiuNz_xyWu0mUPfCA@mail.gmail.com> + <CAEgR2PEyWFO1RFohVEpcb-M7aM-8xjCFvDPeJPD4zF4yTCyZ0A@mail.gmail.com> + <CAEgR2PGrf+4pQRyNC_xKVEKXimKTWveGK9q6YJeZkG0_r=8tkg@mail.gmail.com> +In-Reply-To: <CAEgR2PGrf+4pQRyNC_xKVEKXimKTWveGK9q6YJeZkG0_r=8tkg@mail.gmail.com> +From: Alex Morcos <morcos@gmail.com> +Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 12:50:20 +0000 +Message-ID: <CAPWm=eUCQo+1+2SWjpWG1kcidcLcugwTvVbug6WNmZBRVm_ebg@mail.gmail.com> +To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>, + Daniele Pinna <daniele.pinna@gmail.com>, Mark@friedenbach.org +Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1135045e4eb473055a53784d" +X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, + DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, + RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on + smtp1.linux-foundation.org +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Rebatable fees & incentive-safe fee markets +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 12:50:33 -0000 + +--001a1135045e4eb473055a53784d +Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" + +I had the same concern, or a miner could fill the remainder of the block +with their own high fee paying transactions if blocks were required to be +full. + +On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 7:55 AM Daniele Pinna via bitcoin-dev < +bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: + +> Maybe I'm getting this wrong but wouldn't this scheme imply that a miner +> is incentivized to limit the amount of transactions in a block to capture +> the maximum fee of the ones included? +> +> As an example, mined blocks currently carry ~0.8 btc in fees right now. If +> I were to submit a transaction paying 1 btc in maximal money fees, then the +> miner would be incentivized to include my transaction alone to avoid that +> lower fee paying transactions reduce the amount of fees he can earn from my +> transaction alone. This would mean that I could literally clog the network +> by paying 1btc every ten minutes. +> +> Am I missing something? +> +> Daniele +> _______________________________________________ +> bitcoin-dev mailing list +> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev +> + +--001a1135045e4eb473055a53784d +Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +<div><div dir=3D"auto">I had the same concern, or a miner could fill the re= +mainder of the block with their own high fee paying transactions if blocks = +were required to be full.=C2=A0</div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div>On= + Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 7:55 AM Daniele Pinna via bitcoin-dev <<a href=3D"= +mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfounda= +tion.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D= +"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D= +"auto">Maybe I'm getting this wrong but wouldn't this scheme imply = +that a miner is incentivized to limit the amount of transactions in a block= + to capture the maximum fee of the ones included?<div dir=3D"auto"><br></di= +v><div dir=3D"auto">As an example, mined blocks currently carry ~0.8 btc in= + fees right now. If I were to submit a transaction paying 1 btc in maximal = +money fees, then the miner would be incentivized to include my transaction = +alone to avoid that lower fee paying transactions reduce the amount of fees= + he can earn from my transaction alone. This would mean that I could litera= +lly clog the network by paying 1btc every ten minutes.</div><div dir=3D"aut= +o"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Am I missing something?</div></div><div dir= +=3D"auto"><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Daniele=C2=A0</div>= +</div> +_______________________________________________<br> +bitcoin-dev mailing list<br> +<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">= +bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a><br> +<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" = +rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail= +man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br> +</blockquote></div></div> + +--001a1135045e4eb473055a53784d-- + |