From: Arla Johnson (megao@sk.sympatico.ca)
Date: Sun Sep 26 1999 - 20:12:24 MDT
attached mail follows:
Doug Skrecky wrote:
> How effective are traditional dietary and exercise interventions for
> weight loss?
>
> Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 1999 31(8): 1129-1134
> Wayne C. Miller
>
> Abstract Health care professionals have used restrictive dieting and
> exercise intervention strategies in an effort to combat the rising
> prevalence of obesity in affluent countries. In spite of these efforts,
> the prevalence of obesity continues to rise. This apparent
> ineffectiveness of diet and exercise programing to reduce obesity has
> caused many health care providers, obesity researchers, and lay persons
> to challenge the further use of diet and exercise for the sole purpose of
> reducing body weight in the obese. The purposes of this paper were to
> examine the history and effectiveness of diet and exercise in obesity
> therapy and to determine the best future approach for health promotion in
> the obese population. A brief survey of the most popular dieting
> techniques used over the past 40 yr shows that most techniques cycle in
> and out of popularity and that many of these techniques may be hazardous
> to health. Data from the scientific community indicate that a 15-wk diet
> or diet plus exercise program produces a weight loss of about 11 kg (24
> lb) with a 60-80% maintenance after 1 yr. Although long-term follow-up
> data are meager, the data that do exist suggest almost complete relapse
> after 3-5 yr. The paucity of data provided by the weight-loss industry
> has been inadequate or inconclusive. Those who challenge the use of diet
> and exercise solely for weight control purposes base their position on
> the absence of weight-loss effectiveness data and on the presence of
> harmful effects of restrictive dieting. Any intervention strategy for the
> obese should be specific to chronic disease risk and symptomatologies and
> not limited to medically ambiguous variables like body weight or body
> composition.
>
> Additional note by poster:
>
> The main weight loss motivation for females at least is to increase
> sexual attractiveness. Unfortunately, while average BMI in our
> exercise-challenged automobile-centered society has been increasing, the
> ideal preferred BMI has been steadily decreasing till it has now reached
> the extraordinary point were any further decrease would halt menstruation
> and eliminate fertility. The female BMI, that is most preferred by male
> undergraduates is now only 20, so it is little wonder that females are
> starving themselves to compete. (The Lancet August 1998 352: 548)
> To calculate BMI mulitply body weight in pounds by 703 and divide by
> height in inches, then divide by height in inches again. For example if
> the height is 5 feet 5 inches (or 65 inches), and weight is 120 lbs then
> BMI = (703 X 120)/(65 X 65) = 20.
> The only suggestion this poster has to the "younger" generation is
> this: "Come on guys, get real, a generation ago Marilyn Monroe and Jane
> Mansfield were considered hot stuff. Just look at pictures of beautiful
> women dating from the middle ages, and you will see this obsession with
> thin women is a recent aberration. Historially there exists no preference
> for women with a less than curvaceous figure. Think again: do you really
> prefer thin or voluptuous women?"
Given all the medical literature presented and referred to as well as
discussion on technology and social systems current and future which someone
who might refer to themselves as "Extropian" might seek to have knowledge of
and use to ehance their
existance......exactly what things does each of you and those around you do to
preserve your body and mind each day.. in essence how do you apply or ideally
would you like to apply information to create for yourself an "Extropian
Lifestyle"?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:05:17 MST