From: Billy Brown (ewbrownv@mindspring.com)
Date: Wed Aug 25 1999 - 07:41:20 MDT
O'Regan, Emlyn wrote:
<regarding implementing a completely virtual government on the net:>
> Do you think that you could somehow attach control of real-world resources
> to mailing lists? So various lists could actually make binding decisions
> that affect the physical world? Then maybe you start getting something
like
> what Billy proposes above. You could eventually attach *all government* to
> mailing lists which any person in the world was free to join or leave at
any
> time. Sounds pretty unstable to me, but I'd like to hear good reasons why
> it'd work or not.
I don't think that mailing lists provide the depth of interpersonal
interaction (not to mention economic transactions) that you need to have a
real society. MUD-type systems can get closer, but what you really want is
a virtual community with decent bandwidth and facilities for exchanging real
money.
That aside, I think the single bigest barrier to creating purely virtual
states is ensuring their independence. Right now, such a community would be
very vulnerable to attack by nation-states (especially the state its servers
are located in). Since just about every country with decent Internet
connectivity also participates in a web of international mutual extradition
treaties, it would be very difficult to set up an independent legal regime.
On line theft, fraud, and other serious (i.e. widely recognized) crimes will
end up being punished by some physical country, which means that the virtual
states can never actually have sovereignty.
> As Billy suggests, different styles of control could be tried by different
> groups (democracy, rule by everyone (where everyone can vote on
everything),
> monarchy, dictatorships, corporate fun, etc...) and natural selection
should
> sort out the goats from the sheep. Although anyone who's ever played a
> multiplayer strategy game will concurr that there are many factors
involved
> in surviving such a setup - looking weak can be real bad, looking strong
can
> be REAL bad.
This is one reason I want that vestigial national government - it can
prevent the localities from making war on one another, which forces them to
compete within the rules of the market.
Billy Brown, MCSE+I
ewbrownv@mindspring.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:04:53 MST