From: John Clark (jonkc@worldnet.att.net)
Date: Mon Aug 16 1999 - 23:57:44 MDT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Joseph C Fineman <jcf@world.std.com> Wrote:
>Antineutrinos exist in any case.
Yes, they were actually discovered experimentally before neutrinos were.
>They are distinguished from neutrinos by their helicity (direction
>of spin relative to their direction of motion). When a neutron decays,
>for example, it yields a proton, an electron, and an antineutrino.
>However, it seems to me that if neutrinos have rest mass, this
>distinction must in principle lapse, since you can then choose a
>frame of reference in which the helicity is reversed.
You can't turn a right hand glove into a left one in any frame of
reference, at least not if you stay in 3 dimensions; you'd have to
flip it around in the fourth spatial dimension. Besides, the two
particles act differently. A antineutrino is absorbed (rarely) by a
proton which turns into a neutron and a positron (also called a
anti electron), a neutrino is absorbed (rarely) by a neutron which
turns into a proton and a electron.
The evidence is starting to look pretty good that the neutrino
does have a rest mass although a very tiny one, it's by far
the lightest known particle with mass, however there are so
many neutrinos they could make up the bulk of the universe.
John K Clark jonkc@att.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.5.5
iQA/AwUBN7j52N+WG5eri0QzEQKH4QCgnm6a8iQTzsEtapfyZamvpnT98GYAoPRr
WXS/y7duUb1RgYgr4106ZGAI
=/js0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:04:47 MST