Re: Submolecular nanotech

From: Damien Broderick (damien@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Thu May 20 1999 - 09:36:16 MDT

Next message: Damien Broderick: "Re: >H: Jupiter brain substrate (WAS: Goals)"
Previous message: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: ">H: Jupiter brain substrate (WAS: Goals)"
In reply to: Gina Miller: "Re: Submolecular nanotech"
Next in thread: Randy: "New Star Wars Movie Anti-Extropian?"
Reply: Randy: "New Star Wars Movie Anti-Extropian?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

At 11:06 PM 18/05/99 PDT, nanogirl wrote:

>>I agree 11%

>OOPPPSSS I swear I meant 100 %

Aw, shit, ruin the illusion of sly wit, why doncha.

Actually I assumed this was the preliminary miniaturised percentage.

Damien Broderick

Next message: Damien Broderick: "Re: >H: Jupiter brain substrate (WAS: Goals)"
Previous message: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: ">H: Jupiter brain substrate (WAS: Goals)"
In reply to: Gina Miller: "Re: Submolecular nanotech"
Next in thread: Randy: "New Star Wars Movie Anti-Extropian?"
Reply: Randy: "New Star Wars Movie Anti-Extropian?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:46 MST