From: Bryan Moss (bryan.moss@dial.pipex.com)
Date: Tue Mar 30 1999 - 10:28:12 MST
Dan Fabulich wrote:
> I really have to disagree here. MWI DOES give a better
> explanation of the existence of randomness: it
> demonstrates that what appears random isn't, and
> explains why it would appear random anyway. What more
> would we want from such an answer?
You’re right; although the description you quoted from the Many-Worlds FAQ
is of (what I would call) subjective uncertainty rather than indeterminacy.
And therein lies my own confusion.
BM
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:26 MST