From: James D. Wilson (netsurf@sersol.com)
Date: Mon Feb 01 1999 - 08:34:47 MST
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
What to do?
1. Join us on spam-l
2. Lobby your state senators/representatives for strong anti-spam
legislation in your state which includes prison time for
knowingly/intentionally transferring the cost of advertisement from
the sender to intermediate networks and the end users. Class C felony
would do the trick.
3. Follow up on and complain to the upstream providers of every spam
you receive. Do not "just press delete."
4. Pressure your ISP to use the MAPS Realtime Blackhole List as well
as ORBS, DSSL, ORCA anti-spam listings on their mail server.
For a start...
- -
James D. Wilson
"non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem"
William of Ockham (1285-1347/49)
- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-extropians@extropy.com
[mailto:owner-extropians@extropy.com]On Behalf Of Karsten Bander
Sent: Monday, February 01, 1999 1:30 AM
To: 'extropians@extropy.com'
Subject: RE: Junk mail and rotting web (SPAM)
- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Seems to me that by now the Spammers have reached our shore .... I had
three mails offering various "services" in my inbox this morning. Two
came from this listserver. Perhaps the access to post in this group
should be restricted to registered members of the mailing list. Should
be possible.
Some years ago, when commercialization hit the net, I hoped that this
would pass just like bad weather. Seems I was wrong. Each time I think
that ba now it's enough, some freaks discover a new way of making the
net more annoying. As I seldom use search engines, I did not recognize
by now that they are SPAMmed too. The newsgroups, though, have to be
considered obsolete.
What to do? I recently read that the US government, pushed by the
lobby of SPAMmers, wants to legalize SPAM. SPAM is illegal today, but
things seem to change. Let's hope that this won't happen.
Perhaps it would help if anonymous accounts would be banned from
newsgroup posting. Perhaps it would help it mail services like gmx or
bigfoot would not allow mass mailings AKA SPAM. I recently tested gmx
and found out that it is no problem to make some easy mass mailings
from their system.
The actual plan of the European parliament shows us some more drastic
way to stop the SPAM flood from the US: If the US servers allow SPAM
to be sent over the net, the transatlantic connection can be cut! This
would cut the European net from the rest of the world, but it would
also stop most of the SPAM!
The most efficient way to avoid this junk would be the capitalistic
one: Allow mass mailings, but let the dumb ass who wants to send them
pay all the costs to post and transmit them. That would definitely
help!
kbaender@bigfoot.com
http://home.ivm.de/~Kasimodo/
- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 5.5.3i for non-commercial use
<http://www.pgpi.com>
iQA/AwUBNrWCNnfT5LIjm9pwEQLPIACdFZ7FeMvtyOcXCAZeX5Bpc8Ob3t4AniRr
enty07k2xkmQJz415K2yNhc7
=ffvB
- -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.0.2
Comment: Spammers are NetAbusers - Jail Them With The Other Criminals
iQA/AwUBNrXJljAufbtGOmgdEQKzwgCfdD1pMfGMxVnaxyjJQFj0YcxPy+YAoP9Z
heA1fTthl6kTGd9Zb7OSWT//
=DGB8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:02:58 MST