From: mark@unicorn.com
Date: Mon Feb 01 1999 - 09:31:13 MST
Karsten Bander [Karsten.Baender@ivm.de] wrote:
>What to do? I recently read that the US government, pushed by the
>lobby of SPAMmers, wants to legalize SPAM. SPAM is illegal today, but
>things seem to change.
Uh, which law, exactly, makes spam illegal, and in which countries? At the
moment various aspects of spam may or may not be illegal (e.g. fraudulent
forgery of email addresses, denial of service, etc), but not the actual
act of spamming.
>The actual plan of the European parliament shows us some more drastic
>to stop the SPAM flood from the US: If the US servers allow SPAM
>to be sent over the net, the transatlantic connection can be cut! This
>would cut the European net from the rest of the world, but it would
>also stop most of the SPAM!
Sounds about the level of intelligence of the Eurocrats; if you don't like
spam, cut all Europeans off from the rest of the Net. Geez.
And even if that proposal wasn't totally absurd, much of the spam I've
received in the last couple of months claims to come from Russia and
China...
James D. Wilson [netsurf@sersol.com]
>2. Lobby your state senators/representatives for strong anti-spam
>legislation in your state which includes prison time for
>knowingly/intentionally transferring the cost of advertisement from
>the sender to intermediate networks and the end users. Class C felony
>would do the trick.
Boy, I'm glad to see Extropians arguing for free-market solutions to
problems rather than calling in big brother every time someone annoys
them.
Look, as someone who's had to deal with asshole spammers sending out
literally millions of messages with a forged unicorn.com return
address, I have more reasons than most to support the death penalty for
spammers. But these kind of proposals are absurd authoritarian solutions
to a minor problem which will destroy most of our freedom on the Net in
order to potentially save a few minutes deleting garbage from our
mailboxes.
Frankly, the worst problem the Net faces is not spam or web abuse, it's
the dumbocratic idiots jumping in to sacrifice out freedoms to their big
brother solutions to minor problems; as with the Slashdot folks arguing
to ban anonymity so they don't have to read so many flames.
Mark
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:02:58 MST