From: Eric Ruud (ejruud@ucdavis.edu)
Date: Mon Dec 07 1998 - 00:50:53 MST
>> > Indeed, I personally think that it is not possible for a
>> > person who honestly believes in God to be a moral person or
>> > lead an effective, worthwhile life, so the cost of belief
>> > is very high--the sacrifice of this life for the false hope
>> > in the next.
>>
>> I'm sorry, but I think this statement is simply false.
>> What about Martin Luther King, to name the first example to spring
>to mind?
>>
>Shame, shame. If you mean Dr Martin Luther King, Jr., I'm afraid
>you're overlooking the fact that he was a communist and had several
>extra-marital affairs, and his doctoral thesis is littered with
>plagiarisms. He may have espoused "good" ideas, but I don't know if
>we should consider him to be a "moral" man.
You have a valid point about Martin Luther King, but I still don't think
that you can denounce the morality of all Christians just because a lot of
them are, by your standards, immoral. It's odd that the character flaws you
point out in Martin Luther King, Jr. are those that imply a lack of faith
and a disobedience to Christian values. It's funny that you mention
communist as an immoral political position.
I know many open-minded Christians, and I have to say that, as far as
morality goes, they have me beat by a long shot. While I do not know the
absolute truth on any famous Christians, and therefore cannot give you an
example, I know that it is foolish to say that someone is more immoral for
believing in God. Maybe a bit delusional, but not immoral.
I think we might take a lesson from Shakespeare and Christ in knowing that
we are all immoral, and therefore cannot really judge the character of
anyone, much less an entire group of people.
-Eric Ruud
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:54 MST