From: Paul Hughes (planetp@aci.net)
Date: Tue Nov 24 1998 - 23:28:08 MST
mark@unicorn.com wrote:
> Now you just have to explain why "rewiring" criminals is somehow better than
> killing them. As I see it, there are just certain kinds of people you can't
> share a planet with, and you have to either exile them, kill them mentally
> with this kind of reprogramming, or kill them physically. I don't see why
> killing them mentally is an improvement over killing them physically, and
> personally I'd argue for precisely the opposite.
How can you decide what is good for everyone else? You can't. So how can you say
that killing someone is better for them than re-programming them? Let them
decide. They can be subjected to re-programming or they can push a button at the
convenient cyanide dispensary and kill themselves. The choice is theirs.
> Your argument seems to be that you can reprogram them into a 'useful member
> of society' and that society will benefit from that. I find the idea of a
> legal system deciding what mental software people should run utterly abhorrent,
> regardless of any economic arguments. Given a choice between physical death
> or involuntary reprogramming into slave labor, I'll take death, thanks.
That is *your* choice! And I agree that its a murky area deciding what is mentally
sound or not. But searching for answers there is much more humane than killing
them without a choice. Otherwise we are creating a system based on vengeance, not
rational inquiry, experimentation and possible advancement.
Paul Hughes
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:51 MST