From: Michael M. Butler (butlerj-nkmail@comp-lib.org)
Date: Fri Aug 14 1998 - 11:50:04 MDT
I've always loved the idea of laser launch.
The rule of thumb for the flight plan, BTW, used to be "thirty gees for
thirty seconds", so it's a bit of a hard ride. IIRC, that's something like
8-10 gees more than the *peak* gee load you get with modified military
launchers. Users had better think about that carefully.
The economics are complex, and (aren't they always?) fraught with politics.
Here's what I think:
The incremental cost per pound has every reason to be very low indeed. I
refuse to believe the lowest figures I've heard, but $100 per pound seems
possible, provided you amortize over a lot of launches, and there are no
surprise failures on the lasers, etc.
The frontend costs are significant (the laser array and the power source
for it: I seem to recall old work suggesting a dedicated nuclear power
reactor?).
Expect some "resistance environmental"--the engine employs air-detonation,
which means NOx byproducts. If I remember right, the last little bit of
delta-vee takes boiling something off or out of the airframe, and that
means changing the beam so it focuses on the airframe somehow, but neither
loses track nor hits the wrong thing nor cooks your payload, all at maximum
distance through (mirage shimmering) air at maximum beam depression.
The use of the ground station technology for other purposes such as
ballistic missile point defense should not be overlooked. Expect this to be
controversial in some circles.
Lastly, there are the usual caveats about government programs, bleeding
edge tech and technologists selling sweet dreams at low prices that never
show up.
MMB
At 10:52 8/14/98 -0400, you wrote:
>I saw this on tv last night:
>
>http://www-aero.meche.rpi.edu/Research/LaserPropulsion/index.html
>
>They claim it will reduce launch costs for small satellites
>by "several orders of magnitude" within something like 5
>years.
>
>But I can't find any exact figures. Does anyone have an idea
>of about how many dollars/pound (or kg) we are talking about
>here, and will this thing really make it possible for the
>average joe (or company) to have their own satellites?
>--
>The future has arrived; it's just not evenly distributed.
> -William Gibson
>______________________________________________________________________
>Visit Hypermart at http://www.hypermart.net for free business hosting!
>
>
===================> Am I expecting a message from you? <=====================
If you're not sure, may I suggest you change my return address when/if you
send mail? Remove the bracketed portion of butler[j-nkmail]@comp-lib.org
===================> "Go team, beat SP*M." <=====================
"The highest love [is] uniquely human, the product of compassion and liberty--
_not one at the expense of the other_." -- L. A. Chu & M. M. Butler
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:27 MST